From: Axil Axil 

                The Inconel wire could be the "Mouse" integrated into the
reactor design.

Or there could be another chamber. Think about the way it is filled. Does
the powder drop all the way down the tube so that if the other end cap was
designed to be the “mouse” then that that is what is being filled? The
Inconel could then have been preloaded with hydrogen, but it would not
become active until the mouse was filled. 

                
                Jones Beene wrote:

                In searching the TP2 document, Inconel is mentioned 11
times, but never the
                grade. Great technical writing, for sure.
                
                All of the grades have substantial nickel of course, and a
few are loaded
                with what are known as Mills' catalysts in addition to
nickel. Inconel 617
                would be especially active due to the high molybdenum and
Inconel 625 is
                known to load and retain hydrogen at high temperature.
                
                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconel
                http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2722217
                
                A common theme in Mills' papers is the synergy of using many
catalysts
                instead of one or two. When carrying 3-phase current, there
will be a part
                of each cycle where the wire attracts protons. All of the
hydrogen could in
                principle be stored in the Inconel after it has been
released from the
                carrier alloy where it is poised to densify.
                
                In any event, there seems to be no good reason to eliminate
the Inconel as
                being active, since it contains lots of nickel - especially
in the context
                of SPP.
                
                The main way that SPP are known to form is on the interface
of a metal and
                ceramic in the presence of a light source and an electric
field, which would
                be the resistance wire itself. Sounds like the ideal setup
for SPP, no?
                
                Would SPP alone supply excess heat? Dunno. That has
apparently never been
                considered. Alternatively would SPP catalyze the formation
of f/H or DDL?
                Probably.
                
                If it were known that SPP alone produced excess heat when
the reactor was
                operated above 500C, (where IR light starts to be produced
at sufficient
                wavelength) that would be a reason that one would not want
to calibrate
                above this temperature, as it would reveal too much.
                
                But it would not surprise anyone who has followed both LENR
and Mills, and
                assuming that excess heat will be validated, if the Mills
camp picks up on
                the Inconel wires - to claim that this is hydrino tech.
                
                Jones
                
                
                
                

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to