When the latest TPT is analyzed in the light of what happens in the context of an E-Cat reactor melt down, things start to make sense.
Let us remember what the E-Cat meltdown is all about as follows: James Bowery December 28th, 2013 at 7:54 PM Dr. Rossi, When you say that reactors “explode” when out of control, do you mean they actually produce a loud noise? Or do they merely destructively over-heat? (As apparently happened to a HotCat in this photograph during the prior validation test:) [image: Image] ----------- Andrea Rossi December 28th, 2013 at 8:32 PM James Bowery: Very sorry, I cannot answer to this question exhaustively, but I can say something. Obviously, the experiments are made with total respect of the safety of my team and myself. During the destructive tests we arrived to reach temperatures in the range of 2,000 Celsius degrees, when the “mouse” excited too much the E-Cat, and it is gone out of control, in the sense that we have not been able to stop the raise of the temperature ( we arrived on purpose to that level, because we wanted to study this kind of situation). A nuclear Physicist, analysing the registration of the data, has calculated that the increase of temperature (from 1,000 Celsius to 2,000 Celsius in about 10 seconds), considering the surface that has increased of such temperature, has implied a power of 1 MW, while the Mouse had a mean power of 1.3 kW. Look at the photo you have given the link of, and imagine that the cylinder was cherry red, then in 10 seconds all the cylinder became white-blue, starting from the white dot you see in the photo ( after 1 second) becoming totally white-blue in the following 9 seconds, and then an explosion and the ceramic inside ( which is a ceramic that melts at 2,000 Celsius) turned into a red, brilliant stone, like a ruby. When we opened the reactor, part of the AISI 310 ss steel was not molten, but sublimated and recondensed in form of microscopic drops of steel. Warm Regards, A.R. Sometimes it good to step back and look at the big picture. That picture includes a endpoint of that energy band. There comes a point at the end of the energy band of the Rossi reaction when the nickel particles do not function anymore in the reaction. The nickel particles become irrelevant. These nickel particles vaporize and other facets of the reaction gain prominence and take over. Even the alumina begins to vaporize. What nickel isotopes are produced is not even relevant at that juncture. The reaction becomes much more exotic than that. In the Hot-cat, Rossi has adjusted the LENR reaction to function in a controllable band of it energy potential. Even in this relatively quiescent state, no gamma radiation is produced. And even in the violent and energetic meltdown state, still no gamma radiation or radioactive isotopes are produced. The very fact that the meltdown stage is so energetic proves that nuclear energy is being taped in ever increasing amounts to vaporize the reactor structure. The answer to the LENR riddle will not be found in what isotopes are being produced, the ultimate basic of the reaction is more wondrous than you can imagine now. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Nah… that’s Randy’s gig. > > Say, in case it hasn’t dawned on ya’ … using up most of your Li-7 with > nickel – which makes the ratio decrease compared Li-6 … this makes it look > like you have converted Li-7 to Li-6 which is not the case. > > It still costs a helluva a lot to make power this way. > > > From: ChemE Stewart > > Are you implying exploding pennies? > > Jones Beene wrote: > How long will it be before the dreaded Ni-62 bombe (best > Inspector Clouseau accent) > From: ChemE Stewart > In general, I think it is not a good idea > to > fly plastic fuselage airplanes with lithium batteries @ 42,000 feet up near > the ionosphere... > From: Terry Blanton > > Jones Beene wrote: > > BTW Bob - you suggested a simple way to > look for the Ni+Li reaction. > > > There is a simpler way yet... get hold of > some those exploding lithium > > batteries... you know ... the one's with > nickel electrodes. > > Or just ride the bus: > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/11158277/CCTV-mobile-phone-battery-exp > lodes-in-womans-hands-on-bus.html > > how galling ! > > One wonders - given the cost of the > Dreamliner, if Boeing will not be far behind on catching onto this. They > can > easily put $100 mill into the task. The gall of them... > > "Gall" n. bold, impudent behavior. > synonyms: > effrontery, impudence, impertinence, cheek, cheekiness, insolence, > audacity, > temerity, presumption, cockiness, nerve, shamelessness, disrespect, bad > manners; > > Hmm... I represent that remark... >
