-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Blanton 

> And one the least costly ways to get high efficiency (I have heard) is by
> way of one of your “down under” washing machine motors – rewired as a
> generator…

Paul and I tried one of these on the you-know-what.  It even puts out
three phases and can be wired for others:

http://www.thebackshed.com/windmill/FPRewire.asp

> We never measured the efficiency; but, it was far less than the CSIRO
motor at 98%.  Other modified Halbach arrays claim as much as 99%
generator efficiency.

If money was not an impediment, I would purchase a CSIRO motor (99% eff) and
Halbach array generator and mount them on a common drive shaft so as to
serve for a test bed for certain claimed OU devices. The most efficient of
these Halbach arrays seems to be in the 1-2 kW range - but needs to be in a
narrow rpm range, but this could be accommodated.

Thus - a device for testing, like the Manelas device which required
electrical power from a battery and returned electrical power to recharge
the battery - which is crux of many claims - could be tested with low
losses, even if a transformer and inverter needed to be added. Cree has a
nice 98+% eff inverter, and specialty transformers are in that range.

With that kind of test bed, it should be possible to close the loop with
anything over COP 1.2 electric-to-electric, like the Bedini, Newman and
other claims. Even if all four losses were considered (motor, generator,
transformer, inverter) this should close the loop.

As for electric to thermal and then back to electric, that has always been
the problem. Mills hopes to solve this with photovoltaics. The wild card
would be the Qu-tube, which is said by the inventor (Dr. Qu - of course) to
be a thermoelectric diode and capable of moving current with heat flow.

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20080009660.pdf

I had the suspicion last week that the 3 of the 6 alumina tubes of Rossi
could be operating as Qu-tubes (left side which is cooler) despite the claim
for AC - and that the end cap on that side was acting as an electrical
diode, but would have been detected.

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to