I interpreted his statement as saying that the SSM mode operates in a manner such that one parameter appears to chase after the other. When not using SSM, it is not possible to see this activity. That would imply that the same reactor is capable of both types of operation.
The latest test indicated that the recent HotCat version can be driven by a continuous power input signal while remaining stable. The earlier versions had suggested that a PWM signal was required to keep them out of thermal run away when a high value of COP is required. My model can be adjusted to demonstrate both types of operation, depending upon how effectively heat can be withdrawn from the active core region. The device geometry appears to be the key parameter. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Oct 21, 2014 5:19 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mouse in the wires? In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT): Hi, This tells us that the cat and mouse are actually separate reactors of the same type (though different sizes?). The mouse runs in continuous mode, and the cat runs in ssm (i.e. is controlled by thermal pulses rather than continuously.) >From: "Axil Axil" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:44:38 AM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mouse in the wires? > > >Curiosone > >October 11th, 2014 at 7:23 AM > >Dr Rossi, >I do not know if you can answer to this question, if not please spam it. >Does the Hot Cat like the one tested by the Independent Third Party have two separated charges, one for the Mouse and one for the Cat ? >W.G. > > > > >83. Andrea Rossi > >October 11th, 2014 at 6:21 PM > >Curiosone: >No, the charge is the same, we have only one charge in that kind of reactor; >by the way: if the ssm is not adopted, the distinction between Cat and Mouse vanishes. >Warm Regards, >A.R. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
