The heading is totally messed up . . . John Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
I think we can just be reasonable and assume that "doesn't care" does not > mean that he may not prefer. > Exactly. That is the colloquial expression. Doesn't care does not likely mean "zero interest in personal gain" but > rather "far more interested in the cause than the personal gain". > I am sure those are his sentiments. > Not putting selfish interest first is not that extraordinary, nor does it > mean there are no selfish interests. > > But in the current climate it does seem extraordinary given the greed > present. > Yes, it is refreshing. Almost quaint. Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > lol! Nice try, Jed. I applaud your contortions. >> > You seem incapable of anything but the most simplistic analysis. You pay no attention to history, such as the fact that Japanese corporations were behind the U.S. and Europe for nearly a century, and yet they found ways to take advantage of that. What I wrote is not a contortion. It is not even controversial. It is common knowledge. The fact that you either did not know this or you never thought about it does not make it contorted. - Jed
