>From a colleague: I can't help but think this is backwards, and is the more offensive departure, not from orthodoxy (which always deserves to be challenged) but from simplicity (Occam) and common sense. Still, he's not far off the track because of the close connection between the "speed" of light and the ultimate discrete motion -- the imaginary logic value or oscillation, which is a simple case of complex.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right James. I think his work is very interesting. I'm interested to know > when someone finally digs into it w/ some technical background and can see > what is good, and what is bad, about it. > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:45 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a "complex >> speed of light" is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the >> dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation "an >> offense against the basic principles of physics": >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/2P9_0930-1-piers-extended_field_theory.pdf >> >> This seems to be his point of departure into "fringe" physics his >> replacement of the vector potential with his derivation of the "potential >> vortex". >> > >
