>From Kevin,

 

> ***I'm in the first category.

> A place to start

> https://www.google.com/search?site= 
> <https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=%22chariots+of+the+gods%22+debunked&oq=%22chariots+of+the+gods%22+debunked&gs_l=hp.3..0.2626.11049.0.11245.33.33.0.0.0.0.267.3634.13j16j3.32.0....0...1c.1.58.hp..4.29.3229.0.F-v4djhiG2Q>
>  
> &source=hp&q=%22chariots+of+the+gods%22+debunked&oq=%22chariots+of+the+gods%22+debunked&gs_l=hp.3..0.2626.11049.0.11245.33.33.0.0.0.0.267.3634.13j16j3.32.0....0...1c.1.58.hp..4.29.3229.0.F-v4djhiG2Q

 

Looks like my hard drive restoration onto a brand new 2TB Segate hard drive was 
successful. It was, however, a bumpy ride. Lots of colorful swearing on my 
part. I suspect at one point during the restoration procedure I did not 
properly ground myself when I inadvertently touched the motherboard. It caused 
a 3.5 hour restoration procedure to fail with only 6 minutes left to complete. 
I had to start from scratch again. Wasn't too happy about that. >:-0

 

Daniken does give me the impression that he is a skilled bullshit artist who 
knows how to sell books. Perhaps some of his ideas are interesting if not taken 
to extremes. 

 

On the other side of the fence there are debunkers like the late Philip Klass 
and James Randi. When it comes to the matter of UFO investigation these two 
individuals seem inept at actually following the principals of the deductive 
reasoning. On a related matter, I recall Randi, after attending what I believe 
was an APS conference held in Baltimore where Pons and Fleishman were 
interviewed, Randi gave a nudge, nudge, wink, wink to Carl Sagan who was also 
in attendance. Apparently Randy walked away convinced that the whole cold 
fusion matter was bullshit, just after listening to a few questions that had 
been directed at P&F from the audience. Randi didn't like the way P&F 
occasionally prefaced some of their replies with: "Well. that's a very good 
question." From Randi's POV that obviously meant these two chemists had to be 
incompetent because from Randi's POV they were incapable of answering the 
skeptic's questions. From Randi POV if they were constantly being reduced to 
prefacing their responses in such a manner it meant they didn't know what they 
were doing. From my POV, it's a classic case of how a magician perceives how 
most people act: from slight-of-hand, deflection & deceit. Case closed! 
Apparently, it didn't take Randi very much deductive reasoning to make up his 
mind on the CF matter. As purveyors who claim to follow the process of 
deductive reasoning, I think they give the process a black eye.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BemTGkjl6U

 

Fascinating.

 

Live long and prosper.  ... \\V/

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

svjart.orionworks.com

zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to