Nicely done paper, but it raises many questions. You say “nanoparticles” but the active electrode appears to be wire and much less wire than before. Are you saying the wire treatment amounts to nanoparticles? Why so little active material compare to the earlier presentation? Why not space the pulses closer together? Is nuclear data available?
This almost looks like a preliminary paper to one where parameters are optimized and other data, including nuclear data is presented, as well as a comparison of active materials. From: Jed Rothwell See: Rothwell, J., Report on Mizuno's adiabatic calorimetry. 2014, LENR-CANR.org. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf This describes the calorimetry Mizuno is now using in his nanoparticle experiments. He reported on these experiments at ICCF18, and Yoshino described them at MIT. The calorimetry has been improved in recent months. I think it is pretty good. The data for the five tests described in this paper can be downloaded here: http://lenr-canr.org/Mizuno/ - Jed
