On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:22 PM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, well sure. >> >> Kevin, I could show you a few coil designs that you could make, they run >> unpowered (They would work powered too). >> > ***You should assume that none of us could make your coil. You make them > & sell them at a profit, as high a margin as you can)... that's how things > work. It is highly advantageous to you. >
Kevin, I think you have he killer instinct I need, want o be my business partner? :) Ok, give me your address and I will send you a coil or 2 of different designs gratis just for your consideration. Actually there is additionally the ability to 'bake' the energy from one of my coils (or other forms) into most any material. This means that if I wish I can sell something that contains no secrets, or only allows for a partial replication. > There are quite a few on this list who have even felt energy from the > images in the past. > ***I don't understand what this means. Perhaps you could elaborate. > In the past I shared some of this tech on Vortex. The email where I covered my explanation (my second post under this subject) was long and likely you didn't read a relivant part. Here it is: And other times I go to the extra bother of making myself sound even less credible by explaining that light is a terrahertz frequency electric and magnetic flux field that puts a stress of the aether/space (fine structure constant) as the aether is used up in manifesting the Electric and Magnetic flux. This means that a functional device can be made from a pattern of light that acts to solidify the aether and relative dark/black areas that has more freedom (less interference). This allows an image to make a real energy, though it is more subtle than a coil. And the success rate with people feeling energy from images is clearly lower, though probably still above 50%, maybe as high as 70%? Though I have never had a good sample size of people trying to feel energy from images. > But what I really would appreciate is some ability to try and connect this > to what we know about physics to help me get an empirical effect. > ***You already have an empirical effect. > Is making most, but not all people feel a sensation in their hand an empirical effect? Additionally some people feel some of my designs and not others. But I guess making people feel it without any psychological component removes the subjective aspect? Or the dramatic health effects? Of course any claim made in this direction will have the charge that it is just a testimonial and not considered as scientific evidence. Really that makes me sound like a snake oil salesman so I often ignore it as evidence. John
