Blaze:
That’s a good question. The license was only good for three years (based on a leaked example) and it relied on products being available for sale, otherwise it had no value. If IH had no plans for production during the remaining window (1 year or so), the license would have been worthless save for the right of the licensee to sue Rossi. Just speculating but the choice may have been to accept no sales through the term (with some hope to extend in the future), sue or a buyout. Just speculation on my part. Ransom From: Blaze Spinnaker [mailto:blazespinna...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:37 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:ecat license buyback Yeah I was going to post that as well. Very peculiar. Why would anyone sell back the license as things are heating up? On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: Andrea Rossi November 19th, 2014 at 7:43 AM Daniele Passerini (blogger of “22 Passi”) You asked me few days ago about why some of our commercial Licensees have cancelled their websites. The reason is that we decided to offer to all our commercial Licensees to buy back their licence at a price, obviously, superior to the price they paid for it. Some of our Licensees have accepted our proposal and sold us back their license. The details of the agreements are covered by NDA ( Non Disclosure Agreement). We maintained with our former Licensees a friendly and collaborative relationship, open to the possibility of future collaboration upon specific issues. Warm Regards, A.R. - - - - For the "ecat bets" that probably reduces the probability that Rossi's running a scam. Of course, the statement could be positive or negative, truth-wise.
