There is no such think as a reactionless drive. Particles must be being
produced in the vacuum by EMF.

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes Axil.  The drive would then qualify as a standard one and the problem
> dissolves.  This does not appear to what the proponents of a reactionless
> drive believe is occurring from what I have determined.  They suggest that
> there is nothing available to carry away the balancing momentum.  Why call
> it a reactionless drive if exhaust can be measured?
>
> Dave
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sun, Nov 23, 2014 5:41 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:They call me a moron. A reply.
>
>  No one knows what is going on in the vacuum. If real particles are being
> produced by EMF in the vacuum, then the drive is not reactionless.
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:23 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> That is the point Robin.  In the case of a car you can find where all of
>> the original mass is located after the car accelerates to a new velocity.
>> It might not be easy, but it can be done.
>>
>> The reactionless drive spaceship can not find the lost mass that is
>> assumed to be converted into energy to generate thrust.  A person onboard
>> the ship will only see that the mass of his ship is depleted since his
>> velocity is constant after the drive is cut off as far as he knows.  Of
>> course he will feel the acceleration as the drive is powered, but he has no
>> way to determine his velocity relative to the universe before or after that
>> occurs.   Velocity is relative to the observer.
>>
>> If we take this process to the extreme, lets assume that 90% of the mass
>> of the original ship is consumed by the energy required to operate the
>> reactionless drive.   Once the drive is shut down the spaceman begins to
>> drift in space.  As far as he can observe, he is sitting still in space and
>> has no kinetic energy.  But where did all that original mass end up?  It
>> just vanished, which makes no sense.
>>
>> With a normal ship that relies upon the conservation of momentum all of
>> the mass that has been ejected can be located.  Whether in the form of
>> electromagnetic waves or raw mass that was ejected, the total will be the
>> same as before the drive is activated.  This makes complete sense and is
>> what has been demonstrated so far in real life.
>>
>> In the first case mass has been lost without anything to show for its
>> existence.  In the second one, nothing is missing and everything adds up as
>> expected.  I find it very difficult to believe that both situations are
>> possible.
>>
>> How would you explain to the spaceman on the ship powered by a
>> reactionless drive where most of the mass of his ship is now located?  Have
>> atoms of fuel actually disappeared?  Even if some form of nuclear reaction
>> is used to power the drive he can not locate the energy generated by the
>> nuclear process.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: mixent <[email protected]>
>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sun, Nov 23, 2014 3:26 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:They call me a moron. A reply.
>>
>>   In reply to  David Roberson's message of Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:25:41 -0500:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >My consideration of reactionless drives is based upon the observation that 
>> >the
>> mass of atoms, molecules, and all other forms of matter remain a constant to 
>> the
>> local observer at least.  I include the mass that can be attributed to energy
>> which is either emitted by some action of the matter or absorbed in other 
>> ways.
>> So far, every attempt that I have made to calculate or measure this 
>> combination
>> yields the same result.  As you know, the total mass-energy would have to 
>> change
>> if the system were to be subject to a reactionless drive.
>> >
>>
>> It's just the same as a car on a road. You know that some of the energy in 
>> the
>> fuel ends up as kinetic energy of the car, and this doesn't surprise you at 
>> all.
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to