-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I still think "end-to-end" is important both as a philosophy and as a technical option, and should still be somehow supported. But we also need to have hosted avatars available for most cases. If we can write TerAngreal's code to "get it right" supporting both cases (including a "mix" of the two?), then that could be moved up into the library for other programs to use as the standard procedure. It sounds like the main holes are the factory not setting up an identity[VOS Identity metaojbect]-based access control for the requesting client, and the local-object fallback for avatar component properties also making poor assumptions? Reed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEOZJnFK83gN8ItOQRAieyAJ9qqrxsVj+EoPX33RjG6iMzRPRfIQCeMLCX +dmx8yu9SFSChhZaJZlTGWU= =PQn+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list [email protected] http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
