On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:00:30AM +0000, Lalo Martins wrote: > > For me this kills it. How much do you estimate it would set you back? > And is what's wrong with the current design serious enough to justify > this time? A good yardstick for that is: is the new design sufficiently > better that, if you stop now to implement it, you'll still have gone as > far by end of this year as you would if you don't?
I know, that's why I wanted to get input from everyone first. The original reason I even got on this track was that in the process of designing serialization and marshaling for getters and setters, I realized the old tentative design created a number of problems I couldn't resolve, which caused development to hit a brick wall. I actually have a long email I wrote last week outlining the problems in great detail, I didn't send it then but I will do so now. > *IF* you really think it's worth it, then I'm willing to discuss the > details; but I think before we even get to that, it would be good to > discuss whether a project of this magnitude is worth considering at all. Well, at the moment I'm in a bind one way or the other, since I can't proceed without resolving this impass. -- [ Peter Amstutz ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Lead Programmer][Interreality Project][Virtual Reality for the Internet] [ VOS: Next Generation Internet Communication][ http://interreality.org ] [ http://interreality.org/~tetron ][ pgpkey: pgpkeys.mit.edu 18C21DF7 ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
