Something I have noticed. If I rename AB-bonds to bonds and AAB-angles
to angles, ie

<cg_bonded>
      <bond>
        <name>bond</name>
        <beads>
        A1 B1
        A2 B2
        </beads>

        <name>BB-bond</name>
        <beads>
        B1 B2
        </beads>
      </bond>

      <angle>
        <name>angle</name>
        <beads>
        A1 B1 B2
        B1 B2 A2
        </beads>
      </angle>
    </cg_bonded>

and run edited commands:
hist AB-bond.dist.ib *:bond:*
hist BB-bond.dist.ib *:BB-bond:*
hist AAB-angle.dist.ib *:angle:*

tab set T 250
tab set scale bond
tab AB-bond.pot.ib *:bond:*
tab BB-bond.pot.ib *:BB-bond:*
tab set scale angle
tab AAB-angle.pot.ib *:angle:*
q

I still have no output for bond (A1 B1 and B2 A2) but this time I get
something for the angle:

...

> histogram created using 0 data-rows, written to AB-bond.dist.ib
> histogram created using 1000 data-rows, written to BB-bond.dist.ib
> histogram created using 2000 data-rows, written to AAB-angle.dist.ib
> > > > histogram created using 0 data-rows, written to AB-bond.pot.ib
> histogram created using 1000 data-rows, written to BB-bond.pot.ib
> > histogram created using 2000 data-rows, written to AAB-angle.pot.ib

Is there some trick about naming? o.O

Thanks, V

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.

Reply via email to