On Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:30:43 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
>
> I did what you have written copying the file from 2011 to the "scripts" 
> folder and I got the error and creating csg_table. I also added option 
> -fade 2.0 in xml file gromacs.g_rdf.opts and when running:
>
> # 
> ERROR:                                                                        
>                                                                   
> #
> # do_external: subscript 
> /home/ps/ps-fs2/jkm210/Polyglycine/CHANDLER/IBI_METHOD/WCA_probeb4_IBI/scripts/my_rdf.sh
>   
> (from tags rdf gromacs) failed #
>
>
 

> Running subscript 'my_rdf.sh '(from tags rdf gromacs)
> bash: line 16: WORK/IBI_METHOD/WCA_probeb4_IBI/scripts/my_rdf.sh: 
> Permission denied
>
> Would you suggest something please?
>
> Steven
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:55:08 PM UTC+1, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>>
>> 2013/7/25  <[email protected]>: 
>> > And how g_rdf tool of gromacs will know which groups to use from 
>> index.ndx ? 
>> That was one of the reason to deprecate g_rdf and make csg_stat the 
>> default. VOTCA uses types not energy groups. 
>>
>> Back in 2011, we used the following script: 
>> <
>> https://code.google.com/p/votca/source/browse/share/scripts/inverse/calc_rdf_gromacs.sh?repo=csg&name=a3e6095e3ee6>
>>  
>>
>> This could serve as basis for your myrdf.sh 
>> > 
>> > Steven 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Monday, July 15, 2013 12:02:00 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> Dear Votca Users, 
>> >> 
>> >> I have to issues with IBI: 
>> >> 
>> >> 1) I took one my ditributions and calculated on my own potential W= 
>> -kBT 
>> >> ln(RDF) and I got different potential than Votca provide me. For 
>> instance 
>> >> lets calculate the potential minimum for the distribution maximum of 
>> 162. 
>> >> Pot = -.249435*ln(164) = -12.69. The minimum of Votca potential 
>> corresponds 
>> >> to approximately -16 kJ/mol. Where I missed something? is it somehow 
>> >> normalized? 
>> >> 
>> >> 2) After 1st iteration my distribution was much higher than the target 
>> one 
>> >> so I guess the potential should decrease but apparently the new 
>> potential 
>> >> has deeper minima so the next distribution has a even higer 
>> distribution. 
>> >> Could anyone please explain me this? 
>> >> 
>> >> Steven 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups 
>> > "votca" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an 
>> > email to [email protected]. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>> > 
>> > 
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Christoph Junghans 
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to