2016-02-03 15:00 GMT-07:00 Chang Woon Jang <[email protected]>:
> Dear Christoph,
>
>     Thank you very much for your advice.
>
> Do you mean that if I use csg_inverse and then the obtained distributions
> for both bond and nonboned interactions fit to target distributions, the
> potentials are  already extrapolated and ready to be used?
Yes, the xvg file are extrapolated and ready to be used! The pot.new
files are the raw data files.

>
> If the simulation runs with those potentials, are the roughed forces fine?
Yes! Of course there could always be the case that longer simulation
expose some problems with the potentials.

Christoph
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Changwoon Jang
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-02-03 13:40 GMT-07:00 Chang Woon Jang <[email protected]>:
>> > Dear Votca Users,
>> >
>> >      I am wondering about extrapolating non-bonded and bonded (bond and
>> > angle) potentials from csg_inverse.
>> >
>> >      For the bonded and non-bonded potentials obtained from Iterative
>> > Boltzmann Inversion, they do not have poorly-sampled regions in
>> > table_XXX.xvg files. Those non bonded potentials and forces are smooth
>> > and
>> > look similar to Lennard Jones potential curve. Those bonded potential
>> > are
>> > also smooth and U shapes. But the forces are look ugly in the side of
>> > the
>> > minimum.
>> To clarify the *.xvg are the extrapolated and smoothed version of the
>> potentials.
>> For the rough version, have look at *.pot.new
>>
>> >
>> > Questions?
>> >
>> > 1. If there are no poorly-sampled regions in both bonded and non-bonded
>> > potentials from csg_inverse, can I just use those potentials for CG
>> > simulations?
>> Yes! An iteration step is already a short CG simulation.
>>
>> >
>> > 2. Do I need to resample and extrapolate bonded FORCES if those have
>> > poorly-sampled regions?
>> You can always fit the potential with a smooth function or increase
>> the step value to make potentials and hence forces smoother, but as in
>> 1.) if it runs you should be fine.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>> >
>> > Thank you very much for your advice.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Changwoon Jang,
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "votca" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to