2016-06-28 8:34 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang <[email protected]>:
> Dear Christoph,
>
>     Thank you for your response. How do I define exclusion of angle in
> mapping file, xml?
The <angle> block below will automatically generate exclusions.
Check it with:
$ csg_stat --cg DGA.xml --top topol.xml --excl

Christoph
>
> "csg_stat" needs two types xml files, one for molecule (DGA.xml) and one for
> fmatch.xml.
>
> Where do I define the exclusion of angle or bond during rdf calculation?
>
> The following is a molecule xml mapping file. famtch.xml from tutorials has
> no exclusion information.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Changwoon Jang
>
> <cg_molecule>
> <name>Other_chain_A</name>
> <ident>Other_chain_A</ident>
> <topology>
> <cg_beads>
>     <cg_bead>
>         <name>A1</name>
>         <type>A</type>
>         <mapping>A</mapping>
>         <beads>1:DGA:O 1:DGA:O1 1:DGA:C 1:DGA:C1 1:DGA:C2 1:DGA:C3 1:DGA:C4
> 1:DGA:C5 1:DGA:C6 1:DGA:C7 1:DGA:C8 1:DGA:H 1:DGA:H1 1:DGA:H2 1:DGA:H3
> 1:DGA:H4 1:DGA:H5 1:DGA:H6 1:DGA:H7 1:DGA:H8 1:DGA:H9 1:DGA:H10</beads>
>     </cg_bead>
>     <cg_bead>
>         <name>A2</name>
>         <type>A</type>
>         <mapping>A</mapping>
>         <beads>1:DGA:O2 1:DGA:O3 1:DGA:C12 1:DGA:C13 1:DGA:C14 1:DGA:C15
> 1:DGA:C16 1:DGA:C17 1:DGA:C18 1:DGA:C19 1:DGA:C20 1:DGA:H17 1:DGA:H18
> 1:DGA:H19 1:DGA:H20 1:DGA:H21 1:DGA:H22 1:DGA:H23 1:DGA:H24 1:DGA:H25
> 1:DGA:H26 1:DGA:H27</beads>
>     </cg_bead>
>     <cg_bead>
>         <name>B1</name>
>         <type>B</type>
>         <mapping>B</mapping>
>         <beads>1:DGA:C9 1:DGA:C10 1:DGA:C11 1:DGA:H11 1:DGA:H12 1:DGA:H13
> 1:DGA:H14 1:DGA:H15 1:DGA:H16</beads>
>     </cg_bead>
> </cg_beads>
> <cg_bonded>
>     <bond>
>         <name>bond</name>
>         <beads>
>         A1 B1
>         A2 B1
>         </beads>
>     </bond>
>     <angle>
>         <name>angle</name>
>         <beads>
>         A1 B1 A2
>         </beads>
>     </angle>
> </cg_bonded>
> </topology>
> <maps>
>     <map>
>         <name>A</name>
>         <weights>16 16 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> 1</weights>
>     </map>
>     <map>
>         <name>B</name>
>         <weights>12 12 12 1 1 1 1 1 1</weights>
>     </map>
> </maps>
> </cg_molecule>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-06-27 15:33 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang <[email protected]>:
>> > Dear Christoph,
>> >
>> >
>> >         I am correcting the previous question.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you for the clarification of the list. I have another question. A
>> > molecule is bonded with A-B-C beads. The first bead (A) is mapped with
>> > atoms
>> > from 1 to 22 and the second bead (B) is mapped with atoms from 23 to 31,
>> > and
>> > the third bead (C) is mapped with 32 to 53. In this exclusion lists, the
>> > first bead (A) and third bead (C) seem to interact each other. It look
>> > like
>> > that the atoms in A bead are fairly (not fully) interacted with the
>> > atoms in
>> > C bead. Therefore, A-C radial distribution function seems to include 1-3
>> > (A-C) interactions somewhat. Is this correct?
>> If the exclusion list says they are not excluded, so be it. You can
>> add an angle between A-B-C (or a bond between A-C) in the mapping file
>> to exclude them in rdf calculation.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Changwoon Jang
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Chang Woon Jang
>> > <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear Christoph,
>> >>
>> >>    Thank you for the clarification of the list. I have another
>> >> question. A
>> >> molecule is bonded with A-B-C beads. The first bead (A) is mapped with
>> >> atoms
>> >> from 1 to 22 and the second bead (B) is mapped with atoms from 23 to
>> >> 31, and
>> >> the third bead (C) is mapped with 32 to 53. In this exclusion lists,
>> >> the
>> >> first bead (A) and third bead (C) seem to interact each other. It look
>> >> like
>> >> that the atoms in A bead are fully interacted with the atoms in C bead.
>> >> Therefore, A-C radial distribution function seems to include 1-3 (A-C)
>> >> interactions. Is this correct?
>> >>
>> >> Thank you.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Changwoon Jang
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Christoph Junghans
>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> 2016-06-27 13:37 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang <[email protected]>:
>> >>> > Dear Christoph,
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >      I tested the following command.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >   csg_dump --top topol.tpr --excl > exclusion_list
>> >>> >
>> >>> > In the exclusion_list file, the number are listed like
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I have 15000 beads in 300 molecules
>> >>> >
>> >>> > List of exclusions:
>> >>> > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
>> >>> > 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
>> >>> > 3 4 5 6 7 9
>> >>> > 4 5 6 7 9
>> >>> > 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
>> >>> > 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
>> >>> > 7 8 9 10 11 12
>> >>> > 8 9
>> >>> > 9 10 11 12 13 14 21
>> >>> > 10 11 12 13
>> >>> > 11 12 13
>> >>> > 12 13 14 15 16 19 21 22
>> >>> > 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22
>> >>> > 18 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 40
>> >>> > ...
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > What do these numbers mean? The first line has 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
>> >>> > 11
>> >>> > 12. I
>> >>> > do not know what this series of numbers.
>> >>> It means, atom #1 is exclude with 2, 3, 4, ...
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > However, it seems that csg_stat excluded the pairs of beads directly
>> >>> > bonded.
>> >>> > Therefore, I do not need consider the 1-3 interactions in CG system
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > lammps.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I am not sure why the density is higher than atomistic reference
>> >>> > density
>> >>> > when I do not apply 1-3 interactions. I have driven tabulated
>> >>> > potential
>> >>> > using ibi pressure correction method. Are there any suggestions for
>> >>> > better
>> >>> > CG simulation to fix the density?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thank you.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Best regards,
>> >>> > Changwoon Jang
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Christoph Junghans
>> >>> > <[email protected]>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2016-06-27 12:58 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang
>> >>> >> <[email protected]>:
>> >>> >> > Dear VOTCA users,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >     I have a question about radial distribution functions from
>> >>> >> > csg_stat.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I have obtained radial distribution functions and used them for
>> >>> >> > iterative
>> >>> >> > boltzmann inversion to derive non-bonded tabulated potentials.
>> >>> >> > After
>> >>> >> > some
>> >>> >> > iterations, the calculated radial distribution functions were
>> >>> >> > well
>> >>> >> > matched
>> >>> >> > with reference RDF from csg_stat. Then, I used the obtained
>> >>> >> > tabulated
>> >>> >> > potentials for lammps simulations.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >    From the lammps simulation with tabulated potentials, the
>> >>> >> > liquid
>> >>> >> > polymer
>> >>> >> > system has higher density (1.3 g/cc) than the experimental
>> >>> >> > density
>> >>> >> > (1.07
>> >>> >> > g/cc) when I do not consider 1-3 bead pairs which are those
>> >>> >> > separated by
>> >>> >> > 3
>> >>> >> > bonds. However, when I applied 1-3 interactions, the simulational
>> >>> >> > density is
>> >>> >> > in good agreement with experimental density.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >     I think that the reference radial distribution functions from
>> >>> >> > csg_stat
>> >>> >> > are calculated with pairs of beads directly bonded to each other
>> >>> >> > as
>> >>> >> > well
>> >>> >> > as
>> >>> >> > non-bonded pairs.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >     Is this correct?
>> >>> >> This depends on your topology file. csg_stat excludes bonds and
>> >>> >> angles
>> >>> >> automatically.
>> >>> >> However, if you have a topology file without bonds and angles, they
>> >>> >> wont' be excluded.
>> >>> >> To check use:
>> >>> >> $ csg_dump --top topol.xml --excl
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Christoph
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Thank you.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Best regards,
>> >>> >> > Changwoon Jang
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > --
>> >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> >>> >> > Google
>> >>> >> > Groups
>> >>> >> > "votca" group.
>> >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >>> >> > send
>> >>> >> > an
>> >>> >> > email to [email protected].
>> >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >>> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> >> Groups
>> >>> >> "votca" group.
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >>> >> send
>> >>> >> an
>> >>> >> email to [email protected].
>> >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> > Groups
>> >>> > "votca" group.
>> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >>> > send
>> >>> > an
>> >>> > email to [email protected].
>> >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Christoph Junghans
>> >>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups
>> >>> "votca" group.
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> >>> an
>> >>> email to [email protected].
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Changwoon Jang,
>> >>
>> >> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>> >> Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Drexel University
>> >> 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
>> >>
>> >> Voice: (662) 617-2267
>> >> E-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "votca" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to