Hi Christoph, 
if you have a closer look at csgDump_interface, you'll see that masses are 
always fine, but atom types and residue numbers become messed up in the 
"List of molecules" section. Line 184 says:
 2 Name 3:GLN:CA Type H Mass 12.01 Resnr 2 Resname GLN
a clear example of a wrong type. Then, if you move down to line 708, a 
valine residue has the residue number wrong too.
 526 Name 141:VAL:N Type CT Mass 14.01 Resnr 140 Resname VAL
 527 Name 142:VAL:H Type HC Mass 1.008 Resnr 141 Resname VAL
 528 Name 143:VAL:CA Type HC Mass 12.01 Resnr 142 Resname VAL
 529 Name 144:VAL:HA Type C Mass 1.008 Resnr 143 Resname VAL
 530 Name 145:VAL:CB Type O Mass 12.01 Resnr 144 Resname VAL
 531 Name 146:VAL:HB Type N Mass 1.008 Resnr 145 Resname VAL
 532 Name 147:VAL:CG1 Type H Mass 12.01 Resnr 146 Resname VAL
 533 Name 148:VAL:HG11 Type H Mass 1.008 Resnr 147 Resname VAL
 534 Name 149:VAL:HG12 Type C Mass 1.008 Resnr 148 Resname VAL
 535 Name 150:VAL:HG13 Type O Mass 1.008 Resnr 149 Resname VAL
 536 Name 151:VAL:CG2 Type N Mass 12.01 Resnr 150 Resname VAL
 537 Name 152:VAL:HG21 Type H Mass 1.008 Resnr 151 Resname VAL
 538 Name 153:VAL:HG22 Type CT Mass 1.008 Resnr 152 Resname VAL
 539 Name 154:VAL:HG23 Type H1 Mass 1.008 Resnr 153 Resname VAL
 540 Name 155:VAL:C Type CT Mass 12.01 Resnr 154 Resname VAL
 541 Name 156:VAL:O Type HC Mass 16 Resnr 155 Resname VAL

I will try to reproduce the error with a smaller selection of atoms, though 
I am pretty busy until the 16th Oct. Notes on how to reproduce the error 
were attached previously, and should not be complicated to follow.

I don't know how to interpret the large amount of lines that "gmx dump" 
prints out, so to check that its output is correct:
 - you could check that with the previously attached .tpr
 - I could follow some instructions on how to use "gmx dump".


Best,
Albert

On Sunday, October 1, 2017 at 7:45:10 PM UTC+1, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> Albert, 
>
> 2017-10-01 3:20 GMT-06:00 Albert Solernou <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>: 
> > Hi Cristoph, 
> > thanks for your reply, and for pointing to the code, and sorry I forgot 
> to 
> > attach the messy output. It is now attached, as well as the conflicting 
> .tpr 
> > obtained just following the previous notes. 
> > 
> > It would be great to know what do you think of it. 
> Sorry, but what kind of output are you expecting? In your 
> "csgDump_interface" atomtypes seem to be consistent with the atom 
> names, same for the masses. 
>
> And have you checked that "gmx dump" outputs the right number? 
>
> Plus, could you make a simple system with just 2 residues exhibit the 
> same misbehavior? (That would be easier to us to debug.) 
>
>
> Christoph 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Albert 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 9:58:06 PM UTC+1, Christoph Junghans 
> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Hi Albert, 
> >> 
> >> 2017-09-28 6:24 GMT-06:00 Albert Solernou <[email protected]>: 
> >> > Hi All, 
> >> > I think that there is a bug in csg_dump, as it dumps wrong atom types 
> >> > and 
> >> > some wrong numbers when working with some modified tpr files. 
> >> Can you be a bit more explicit which numbers are wrong? 
> >> 
> >> > 
> >> > Not sure how much the bug affects my work, but feel I should report 
> it 
> >> > anyway. I attach clear instructions on how to get the bug, as well as 
> >> > two 
> >> > input files and the wrong output of the csg_dump. I can send the 
> whole 
> >> > set 
> >> > of files but it is 145M. 
> >> > 
> >> > Could you please have a look at this? 
> >> When csg_dump reads tpr files it uses Gromacs' libgmx, so the first 
> >> step would be to run "gmx dump" on your tpr files and check if the 
> >> same "wrong numbers" show up. 
> >> Honestly VOTCA's wrapper around libgmx is very thin, see: 
> >> 
> >> <
> https://github.com/votca/csg/blob/master/src/libcsg/modules/io/gmxtopologyreader.cc#L93>
>  
>
> >> 
> >> Christoph 
> >> > 
> >> > Many thanks, 
> >> > Albert 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups 
> >> > "votca" group. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send 
> >> > an 
> >> > email to [email protected]. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Christoph Junghans 
> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "votca" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christoph Junghans 
> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to