Thank you.

On Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 1:31:52 PM UTC-4, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Alexander Alexander 
> <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > 
> > Thanks. 
> > I would be so thankful if one could comment on below questions; 
> > 
> > 1. The manual states that the IBI so far only supports iterative 
> refinement 
> > of non-bonded interactions, however, I saw an example of setting.xml 
> file in 
> > mailing list in which the bonded interactions were also defined for 
> > refinement by IBI, so, does IBI also support the bonded interactions? 
> Yes, it is supported for a while now! 
> It seems we forgot to update the manual, where in the manual is it 
> wrong? And can you send a pull request against 
> https://github.com/votca/csg-manual to fix it? 
>

Yes I will. 

>
> > 
> > 2. I guess the ensemble chosen for MD simulation during IBI depends on 
> the 
> > physics of the system (similar to the normal MD simulation), however, 
> the 
> > Tcoupl = 0 and Pcoupl = 0 has been assigned for the temperature and 
> pressure 
> > for all of the example of CG I have seen, so, I was wondering if the 
> > ensemble should be similar to the all atoms MD  simulation by which 
> > target_rdf.xvg has been calculated, am I right? 
> Yes, we usually do both simulations in NVT ensemble and we achieve 
> that with a stochastic dynamics (sd) integrator in Gromacs. 
>
> > 
> > 3. We have to add the [ defaults ] and [ atomtypes ] section to the 
> > topol.top generated by csg_gmxtopol, if I am not wrong the  [ defaults ] 
> > depends on the type of force field we want to use which should be again 
> > similar to the target all atom MD simulation, for the [ atomtypes ], how 
> I 
> > should indicate the C6 and C12 parameter for each bead? of course the C6 
> and 
> > C12 are available in ffnonbonded.itp for individual atoms involved in 
> each 
> > beads but not for the beads itself. For instance to get the mass of bead 
> we 
> > sum up the mass of individual atoms involved in that bead. 
> When VOTCA creates the xvg tables for Gromacs, it writes the potential 
> and forces in the C12 column, so you should set C12 to 1.0 (except if 
> you need to scale it for some reason) and C6 to 0.0 (or whatever). 
>
> If I simply copy the content of exclusions.txt to my topol.top file, then 
everything will be fine an no mismatching shows up between the rdf's (if 
rest is fine)?  

> > 
> > 4. Below is a part of setting.xml file used in a IBI simulation; 
> > 
> >      <name>ABA</name> 
> >     <min>1.2</min> 
> >     <max>2.9</max> 
> >     <step>0.001</step> 
> >     <inverse> 
> >       <!-- target distribution --> 
> >       <target>angle1.dist.tgt</target> 
> >       <do_potential>0 0 0</do_potential> 
> >       <post_update>smooth</post_update> 
> >       <post_update_options> 
> >         <scale>0.001</scale> 
> >       </post_update_options> 
> >       <post_add>convergence</post_add> 
> >       <gromacs> 
> >         <table>table_a1.xvg</table> 
> >       </gromacs> 
> >     </inverse> 
> >   </bonded> 
> >   <bonded> 
> > Can you please confirm me that the <target>angle1.dist.tgt</target> is 
> the 
> > one we provide in advance and the  <table>table_a1.xvg</table> is the 
> one 
> > which votca results after refinement? (in general for refinement of 
> bonded 
> > and nonbonded interaction <target>case.tgt</target> is the one we 
> provide 
> > and  <table>case.table.xvg</table> is the votca give finally) 
> > Also, how I can calculate the "angle1.dist.tgt" one? 
> yes, <target> is the distribution VOTCA compares the current 
> distribution against and <table> is the table VOTCA will generate from 
> the update of that comparison, the filename is listed, so that you can 
> setup your topology to use exactly the table with the same number. 
>
> Is the angle1.dist.tgt or bond.dist.tgt are the ones that "csg_boltsman *hist 
*..." gives us for a single molecule in vacuum? Any further refinement is 
needed to be performed on what hist gives us?

In the hexane ibi_all example, there is a table.xvg file in the parent 
folder, I was wondering if we have to provide it in advance ourselves or 
the the votca would calculate it in the first step_000?

Thank you.

Best regards,
Alex
 

> > 
> > How should we know the <min>xx</min> and <max>xxx</max> for each 
> > interaction? 
> Just look at the distributions and pick min and max so that the 
> distribution is bigger than 0 and that the extrapolation of the 
> potentials will work (which is a bit of an art in itself). 
>
> Christoph 
>
> > 
> > Thank you very much in advance for your time. 
> > 
> > Best regards, 
> > Alex 
> > 
> > On Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 3:28:44 AM UTC-4, Christoph Junghans 
> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Alexander Alexander 
> >> <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > 
> >> > Thank Christoph. 
> >> > Actually the xmlwf did not give more information than the parse error 
> in 
> >> > the 
> >> > last line. 
> >> > 
> >> > I will take the opportunity to ask one more general question: 
> >> > 
> >> > Using the boltzmann inversion and iterative boltzmann inversion I 
> wand 
> >> > to 
> >> > obtain the coarse-grained parameters (bonded and nonbonded) for a 
> >> > molecule, 
> >> > the molecule has 53 atom which I have mapped them on 5 beads (3 
> types) 
> >> > and 4 
> >> > bonds and 3 angles. The all atom MD simulation for a system 
> containing 
> >> > 307 
> >> > molecules of my interest using gromacs and gromos force filed has 
> also 
> >> > been 
> >> > completed. 
> >> > As a new user, I found the votca manual too scattered (sorry for 
> saying 
> >> > that) to follow in order to obtain the CG parameters, I tried to 
> >> > understand 
> >> > the examples but still I am not able to fulfill the procedure. 
> >> > 
> >> > By considering the explained molecule I would be so appreciated if 
> one 
> >> > could 
> >> > kindly itemize the steps I have to take to obtain all of the CG 
> >> > parameters 
> >> > of the molecule of my interest. 
> >> There is no general practice, you will need to check the literature 
> >> and find a system close to what you want to coarse-grain. 
> >> You could trying to coarse-grain all interactions at once, but usually 
> >> something will not work and make the system explode. 
> >> I prefer to start small and build it up, so a.) Boltzmann invert the 
> >> bonded interactions from a single molecule (in vacuum) trajectory, 
> >> then b.) the non-bonded interactions with iterative Boltzmann 
> >> inversion and last you might want to c.) re-iterate the bonded 
> >> interactions. 
> >> 
> >> This has already been extensively discuss on this mailing list, so 
> >> have a look in the archive. The hexane tutorial might be worth looking 
> >> at, too. 
> >> 
> >> Christoph 
> >> > 
> >> > Thank you very much. 
> >> > 
> >> > Best regards, 
> >> > Alex 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:55:51 PM UTC-4, Christoph Junghans 
> >> > wrote: 
> >> >> 
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Alexander Alexander 
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Solved now, I was missing a backslash in </ident>. 
> >> >> > Anyway, thank you. 
> >> >> The expat package, provides a little tool called "xmlwf", which 
> allows 
> >> >> you to check whether an xml file is well-formatted. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Christoph 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Regards, 
> >> >> > Alex 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 2:20:10 PM UTC-4, Alexander 
> Alexander 
> >> >> > wrote: 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Dear all, 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> The "csg_dump --top case.tpr --cg case.xml" parses error at the 
> last 
> >> >> >> line 
> >> >> >> of my case.xml with the mismatched tag, I can not find out where 
> I 
> >> >> >> am 
> >> >> >> doing 
> >> >> >> wrong, so, I would be so appreciated if you could have a look at 
> my 
> >> >> >> attached 
> >> >> >> case.xml,.top,gro files and help me overcome the issue. 
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Thanks 
> >> >> >> Best regards, 
> >> >> >> Alex 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > -- 
> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> >> > Groups 
> >> >> > "votca" group. 
> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> >> >> > send 
> >> >> > an 
> >> >> > email to [email protected]. 
> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
> >> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Christoph Junghans 
> >> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups 
> >> > "votca" group. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send 
> >> > an 
> >> > email to [email protected]. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Christoph Junghans 
> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "votca" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christoph Junghans 
> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to