Ok, I ran this simulation for a couple of iterations, but in my case
you can already see a structure developing in the A-A rdf after
step_001, which get worse after every iteration, I only did 7 steps.
With structure I mean the rdf has like a sinus wave on it, usually
that is a sign that the molecules aren't moving enough. And the same
thing is also obvious from watching the traj.dump file using VMD.

I am not sure why it happened so quickly for me already, but I am
using LAMMPS 16 Mar 2018 and VOTCA 1.5-dev gitid: 12f8b60.
So it might be worth trying to use the development version of VOTCA.

Christoph

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:02 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry I forgot the data file. I attach it now.
>
> Javier
>
> El martes, 14 de agosto de 2018, 19:22:49 (UTC+1), Christoph Junghans
> escribió:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:03 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi, Christoph,
>> >
>> > thanks for your quick answer.
>> >
>> >> What version of VOTCA are you using? (Run "csg_call --version")
>> >
>> > The version I am using is 1.4.1.
>> It might be worth trying the development version:
>>
>> https://github.com/votca/votca/blob/master/share/doc/INSTALL.md#general-source-installation-instructions
>> We have improved the lammps backend quite a bit.
>>
>> >
>> >>The "step_000/A-A.dist.tgt" in your plot, doesn't seem to be the same
>> > as you send around.
>> >>Why is the one in the plot, so rough?
>> >
>> > I think the plot I sent in my previous message does not show it very
>> > well.
>> > The red curve is the target (which is not well visible under all the
>> > rest)
>> > and the brown one is the divergent result. I attach a new graph showing
>> > only
>> > target, convergent-looking curve at step 270, and divergent result at
>> > step
>> > 360. The bin size for the RDFs is 0.1 Angstroms.
>> Ok, the 270 result doesn't look too bad even though there is something
>> funky going on around 12 AA.
>>
>> >
>> >> Also, there are a bunch of files missing to test your system, so I
>> > cannot check. nut I would certainly start with harmonic potentials for
>> > the bonds.
>> >
>> > I started with harmonic potentials, but I changed to Boltzmann inverted
>> > ones
>> > to check whether that was the problem.
>> Can you send your data file as well?
>>
>> >
>> >>And if you are doing IBI on the non-bonded interactions only, you
>> > don't need a mapping file.
>> >
>> > I thought I needed it but, anyway, it was not affecting the
>> > coarse-graining,
>> > right?
>> True if you give the atoms the right type in the mapping file. I have
>> seen case where the non-bonded interactions differed due to wrong
>> (different) types.
>>
>> >
>> >>Plus the pressure correction block should be somewhere inside an
>> > interaction block, but again make it simple and start without pressure
>> > correction.
>> >
>> > thanks, I take note of it.
>> >
>> > I attach the new figure with only three curves, including the target and
>> > diverged curves, and also the potentials and distributions required to
>> > run
>> > the simulations.
>> >
>> > I must insist that the problem I have also happened to me with no
>> > smoothing,
>> > averaging and pressure correction options, and with harmonic potentials
>> > instead of tables for the bonds and angles. I added these features
>> > sequentially to check whether any of them was causing the problem. I
>> > will
>> > redo the simplest example and post results and files here. In the
>> > meantime,
>> > what could possibly be causing the divergence?
>> In step 360 the RDF don't even approach 1 for larger distances, it
>> might be that your system formed a crystal (or something), so it might
>> be worth watching the MD movie of step 360 and look for something
>> strange going on.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>> >
>> > Kind regards.
>> > Javier
>> >
>> > El martes, 14 de agosto de 2018, 14:06:24 (UTC+1), Christoph Junghans
>> > escribió:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:04 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I am trying to obtain the coarse-grained non-bonded potentials for a
>> >> > dodecane model of type ABBA with LAMMPS. I am no sure what I am doing
>> >> > wrong
>> >> > since the RDFs seem to tend to converge to the target functions, and
>> >> > after
>> >> > some steps they completely diverge. I tried smoothing the potentials,
>> >> > and
>> >> > other tricks (averaging , scaling, pressure corrections, etc) but I
>> >> > am
>> >> > not
>> >> > sure what I am doing wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > I attach the RDFs functions for a number of steps, and the votca
>> >> > files I
>> >> > am
>> >> > using. I hope you can give me any hint to continue.
>> >> What version of VOTCA are you using? (Run "csg_call --version")
>> >>
>> >> The "step_000/A-A.dist.tgt" in your plot, doesn't seem to be the same
>> >> as you send around.
>> >> Why is the one in the plot, so rough?
>> >>
>> >> Also, there are a bunch of files missing to test your system, so I
>> >> cannot check. nut I would certainly start with harmonic potentials for
>> >> the bonds.
>> >> And if you are doing IBI on the non-bonded interactions only, you
>> >> don't need a mapping file.
>> >> Plus the pressure correction block should be somewhere inside an
>> >> interaction block, but again make it simple and start without pressure
>> >> correction.
>> >>
>> >> Christoph
>> >> >
>> >> > Kind regards and thank you in advance.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> > Groups
>> >> > "votca" group.
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >> > send
>> >> > an
>> >> > email to [email protected].
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Christoph Junghans
>> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to