Got it. Thank you for the explanation.

Kind regards,
Akash

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 11:39 AM Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:01 AM Akash Banerjee <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the response. Sometimes its in the initial step, and
> sometimes it occurs after a couple of iterations. I will try to use the
> option as instructed.
> > Can you please explain how do I get an idea of the number of points to
> be used with the option -inverse.post_update_options.extrapolate.points.
> > As of now , what I understand when you say points is the <step> option.
> I am guessing lower values of steps would generate a higher number of
> points between
> > <max> and <min>. Is this correct?
> <step> is the spacing between <min> and <max>. <extrapolate.points> is
> the number of point, starting from <min> and <max> respectively used
> to calculate the average slot used for the extrapolation.  Something
> like <min>+<points>*<step>.
>
> You can find the details here:
>
> https://github.com/votca/csg/blob/master/share/scripts/inverse/table_extrapolate.pl#L129
>
> >
> > Specifically for extrapolation, I have an additional question. I use the
> target RDF to set a <max> and <min>. These max and min values correspond to
> the final non-zero value on each side
> > of the RDF. Now, to extrapolate correctly, do I increase the max value
> and decrease the min value (this would broaden the sampling space for the
> RDF) ? Or is extrapolation not at all connected to the <max> and <min>
> terms? Please help me understand the above idea.
> There are connected as the extrapolation starts at <min> (and <max>).
> <min> and <max> basically defines the range, where IBI or some other
> method is performed. If you increase the range too much, you risk to
> reach areas with poor sampling, i.e. some iteration there is a hit,
> some  iteration there isn't and that will screw up the update as for
> e.g. IBI.
>
> Christoph
>
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
> > Kind regards
> > Akash
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 3:33 PM Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:10 AM Akash Banerjee <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > To add, I was earlier advised to check the extrapolation for the
> input file. If I understand properly, the extrapolation is the max_limit
> value. I had extended the min and max limits from 0.2 - 0.4 to 0 - 1.0.
> >> > This didint really help. Is there any other way to control
> extrapolation?
> >> Is it in the initial step or during the iteration?
> >>
> >> In the iteration you can tweak the number of points to average over:
> >>
> https://github.com/votca/csg/blob/master/share/scripts/inverse/postupd_extrapolate.sh#L33
> >> with the inverse.post_update_options.extrapolate.points option.
> >>
> >> We could expose more options to the user if needed:
> >>
> https://github.com/votca/csg/blob/master/share/scripts/inverse/potential_extrapolate.sh#L25
> >>
> >> Christoph
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 12:05:09 PM UTC-4, Akash Banerjee wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Dear Votca Developers ,
> >> >>
> >> >> I just want some help to understand the following issue.
> >> >>
> >> >> No valid value found in bond_2.dpot.pure_ibi at
> /usr/share/votca/scripts/inverse/potential_shift.pl line 87.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please advice me on what I can do to resolve the above.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thank you for your help!
> >> >>
> >> >> Kind Regards,
> >> >> Akash
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "votca" group.
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to [email protected].
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christoph Junghans
> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "votca" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > akash
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "votca" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Christoph Junghans
> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to