Dear all,

I was wondering if it makes sense to mix all atoms (AA) and coarse-grained 
(CG) potentials in modeling a system including surfactant (in AA), epoxy 
resin (in CG) in water (in CG)? The CG potentials have been parameterized 
using iB and iBI approaches in VOTCA.

And;

As far as I noticed non of the examples in VOTCA's tutorial has assigned 
charge for the CG-beads so that the individual beads in your all examples 
are chargeless, I wonder if CG parametrization would be easier that way or 
there is any other reason for that? If I am not entirely wrong, to consider 
charge for each bead, one should sum up the atomic charges involved in that 
bead similar to bead's weight (<weights> 12 1 1 1 </weights>)? If so, is 
there something similar likes <charges> -0.18  0.06 0.06 0.06 </charges> for 
charge accordingly, in mapping scheme?

Thank you.

Salman Zarrini
Department of Chemical Engineering
Drexel University

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/86dfcb1b-7ad8-4c6d-b2d1-947933f1ee06%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to