Am Mittwoch, 15. April 2020 13:52:01 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Verestek:
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 14. April 2020 19:21:07 UTC+2 schrieb Christoph Junghans:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:40 AM Wolfgang Verestek wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Christoph, 
>>>
>>> it seems to me, that the bonds in topology.xml do not influence the 
>>> result of csg_stat. On contrary, i got the same results regardless of bonds 
>>> being in topology.xml or not. The same is true for for wrapped or unwrapped 
>>> coordinates. The only thing that did change the result was changing the 
>>> cell size in the conf.gro by factor of 10 in each dimenstion which looks 
>>> like the nonperiodic results from Ovito (but made it necessary to scale by 
>>> a factor of 1000 to be in the same range of the plot). Furthermore, i 
>>> confirmed the results of Ovito by VMD. The nonperiodic calculation in VMD 
>>> oversitmates the first peak somewhat, but otherwise the results are in good 
>>> agreement. The results don't match perfectly, but as i don't know how 
>>> exactly VMD or Ovito compute the RDF i guess the match is good enough and 
>>> the drop in the periodic VMD plot should be due to some other reason (maybe 
>>> the g(r) plugin is limited to 3/4 cell lengt or sth.). 
>>> regarding scg_stat it still seems to me that the tail is smoothed or 
>>> periodic images in different directions are omitted. Could that be? I can 
>>> provide the files f necessary. 
>>>
>> Ok now I am getting really confused, I just did a quick comparison of gmx 
>> rdf and csg_stat and the results are right on top of each other.
>>
>> Could you do me a favor and try to follow:
>> ```
>> apt-get install gromacs
>> cp /usr/share/gromacs/top/spc216.gro .
>> wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/votca/csg/master/src/tools/references/spce/sources/grompp.mdp
>> wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/votca/csg/master/src/tools/references/spce/sources/topol.top
>> gmx grompp -c spc216.gro -maxwarn 1
>> echo q | gmx make_ndx -f spc216.gro
>> echo -e "1\n1" | gmx rdf -f spc216.gro -s topol.tpr -n index.ndx -selrpos 
>> mol_com -seltype mol_com -bin 0.02
>> wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/votca/csg/master/src/tools/references/spce/mapping.xml
>> wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/votca/csg/master/src/tools/references/spce/settings_rdf.xml
>> csg_stat --options settings_rdf.xml --top  topol.tpr --trj spc216.gro 
>> --cg mapping.xml
>> csg_map --top  topol.tpr --trj spc216.gro --cg mapping.xml --out cg.dump
>> ```
>> and then calculate the rdf from cg.dump with ovito and vmd and compare 
>> them with rdf.xvg and CG-CG.dist.new.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>
> Ovito and VMD give nearly the same results (green X / blue square). I'm 
> not sure how those two really compute the RDF. For Ovito I can set the 
> cutoff and the number of bins (9.0, 45) and i think the bin center is on 
> the x coordinates. In VMD i can set the cutoff and the delta (9, 0.2). As 
> said, i'm not sure how the bins are decided inside those two progs, so this 
> might lead to small offsets. 
> cg_stat on the other hand is a little bit off compared to ovito and vmd. 
> But this could be imho due to the binning as mentioned before. 
> qualitatively i think it's pretty much the same.
>
> - regards
> Wolfgang
>
forgot the plot

>
>  
>
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 18:17:20 UTC+2 schrieb Christoph Junghans:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:01 AM Wolfgang Verestek <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 02:07:39 UTC+2 schrieb Christoph Junghans:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:59 AM Wolfgang Verestek <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Christoph,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for your fast response. i followed you suggestion, renamed 
>>>>>>> the files and added the box tag to the topology file (files attached). 
>>>>>>> But 
>>>>>>> the result stays the same. So, as you said that gromacs format is 
>>>>>>> better 
>>>>>>> supported i changed my output to gro87 format. No errors, but the 
>>>>>>> discrepancy remains, regardless if i'm using wrapped or unwrapped 
>>>>>>> coords in 
>>>>>>> the conf.gro file. See below. Are there any other things i could 
>>>>>>> change? 
>>>>>>> Another format? 
>>>>>>> Is it possible to set the boundary conditions somewhere 
>>>>>>> specifically? Or could it be that periodic images of the specific atoms 
>>>>>>> are 
>>>>>>> ignored (the simulation box is kind of small and close by region seems 
>>>>>>> ok)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't have time to look at your files yet, but does OVito 
>>>>>> handle exclusion in the same way as VOTCA?
>>>>>> Have a look at the output of "csg_dump --top topology.xml --excl"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How should that look like? I'm not sure if i understand that format 
>>>>> correctly, but it seems correct to me. in my data file Atom with id 1 is 
>>>>> connectod to atoms 2 3 4 and 36. I assume this is non repetitive so id 4 
>>>>> does not show up again for atom id 4 and so on. I did not check the whole 
>>>>> list, but the first 10 lines are correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have 164 beads in 1 molecules
>>>>>
>>>>> List of exclusions:
>>>>> 1 2 3 4 36
>>>>>
>>>> This means the atom #1 is excluded with atom #2, #3,#4 and #36 and 
>>>> hence contributions from these pairs won't go into the RDF.
>>>> VOTCA automatically created exclusion (in same way as Gromacs does) for 
>>>> bonds, angles and dihedrals.
>>>>
>>>> Christoph
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>> 4 5 6 7
>>>>> 7 8 9 10
>>>>> 10 11 12
>>>>> 12 13 14
>>>>> 14 15 16 17
>>>>> 17 18 19 39
>>>>> 20 21 22 23 77
>>>>> ...
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>> Secondly you could use "csg_map --top topology --no-map --trj 
>>>>>> lammps.dump --out out.pdb", to check if the coordinates are read 
>>>>>> correctly. 
>>>>>>
>>>>> apart from the bigger cell for the pdb (where this information is not 
>>>>> included) the positions look ok. (lammps file in "black cores", pdb in 
>>>>> transparent green).
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a way to visualize the xml or gro files? I know vmd, but 
>>>>>>> that segfaults when reading the gro file. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ultimately the whole thing should go into force matching. But i 
>>>>>>> guess the results will be off if already the RDF is wrong? 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it really necessary to have one file per molecule type and what 
>>>>>>> distinguishes different molecule types? If i have several PA6 molecules 
>>>>>>> with different length/count of monomers is that already different 
>>>>>>> molecules?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks and regards
>>>>>>> Wolfgang
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "votca" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/b4b7484f-2663-4fe6-a082-ad3c2ca1ef20%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/b4b7484f-2663-4fe6-a082-ad3c2ca1ef20%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Christoph Junghans
>>>>>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "votca" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/3cd73547-59da-4de8-894d-0345302ebeca%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/3cd73547-59da-4de8-894d-0345302ebeca%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Christoph Junghans
>>>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "votca" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/9c1da74b-2bca-4aa5-b1a1-f26123328000%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/9c1da74b-2bca-4aa5-b1a1-f26123328000%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>
>

-- 
Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/12ef52f9-854d-4404-95e5-54437779ae7a%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to