On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:01 AM Pragati Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I tried increasing the box length in z direction, but the error still 
> persists. Its two layers of graphene each have 96 atoms.
>
> The errors is:
>
> "I have 192 beads in 2 molecules
> I have 48 beads in 2 molecules for the coarse graining
> Reading frame       0 time    0.000
> 1.128
> 1.587
> 2.668 0.338
> 1.141
> 1.688
> an error occurred:
> coarse-grained bead is bigger than half the box
>  (atoms C (id 1), C (id 21) , molecule 1)"
>
>
> Is there an issue with the atomistic simulation?
There is nothing wrong, it is just that if a molecule is bigger that
1/2 box length the mapping is unique and hence VOTCA won't do it.
Imagine the following toy example in 1D: in a periodic box of length L
with one particle at L/4 and one at L*3/4 and you try to map these two
particles together, then the mapped particle could be at position L/2
or 0.

>From the six numbers above, you can calculate 3 distances:
|1.128-2.668|, |1.587-1.141| and |0.338-1.688| which you can compare
to the 3 box lengths to know which box length you need to increase.

Christoph


>
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 7:44 PM Christoph Junghans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 1:40 AM Pragati Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > Can the coarse grain potentials using IBI for graphene sheet which is 
>> > periodic along xy direction be performed in votca.
>> >
>> > I am trying to do it and it's throwing an error saying the "bead is bigger 
>> > than half of the box".
>> This check is in there to avoid  non-unique mapping of the position in
>> case of periodic boundary conditions.
>> You could certainly modify the code to disable it and see what
>> happens, but my guess is your setup of the sheet has a very small box
>> length in z.
>> As that is mainly empty space, just try to increase the box size by a
>> factor 10 in z or so.
>>
>> Above the error message VOTCA prints out two vectors, the first 3
>> numbers are the position of the reference point for the pbc
>> calculations r0 and the next 3 numbers are the positions of the atoms
>> that are too far away from r0. Can you post these numbers?
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>> > Any ideas on this.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > --
>> > Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
>> > ---
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAMpF9Q3hL857_shxbt-bCSZ7Kf6vrbkGt%3D1DFVUE1CBYSd7qCA%40mail.gmail.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>>
>> --
>> Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "votca" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAHG27e5Gy7wZSdt6ALR9r4gWb79vf8nzeGX0ZrzbSwgFBXZvtQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>
> --
> Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAMpF9Q3rBGmNYzPpiv7eH6MQJ2Zkwqr1BzDTAC0HoqXXOT_bow%40mail.gmail.com.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/CAHG27e4Xjc9bz6yu%3D3W7VqQww4AudwJmyNp2tjxJd%3DwgjoWH6A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to