Hello,

so if you want more than 100s kmcmultiple will assume that you want steps 
so you just got steps out. (Maybe we should fix that interface a bit. )

It could be that there is a bug, but KMC calculations are not easily 
converged so, it really depends on your energy landscape as well. 

Would be nice if you could post a minimal example.

张恒悦 schrieb am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2023 um 17:01:46 UTC+2:

> Hello, 
>
> A bug was found. In the xtp tutorials of KMC, 1000 seconds of KMC 
> simulation was scheduled to run. However, after checking the output, I 
> found that only 1000 steps of KMC was executed. According to the manual, if 
> 'runtime' is larger than 100, it may be steps.
>
> What's more, another issue relating to KMC made me a bit nervous. I want 
> to operate a kmc simulation to calculate charge mobility. I made this 
> calculation with the calculator kmcmultiple. From the article [1], two 
> methods can be applied to calculate the mobility. One is with the Einstein 
> relationship, and another one is with the equation *μ=μE/E* (as shown in 
> the following figure).
>
> However, during the calculation, I changed the strength of electric field, 
> but *μE* dosen't change a little. And I have no idea on how to calculate 
> this with Einstein relationship for I found that only overall mobility was 
> ouputed but the mobility of every direction cannot be found.
>
> Sorry to disturb you! Thx a lot!
>
>
> Best regards,
> Hengyue Zhang
>
> [1]Reggiani, L.; Brunetti, R.; Normantas, E. Diffusion Coefficient of 
> Holes in Silicon by Monte Carlo Simulation. *Journal of Applied Physics* 
> *1986*, *59* (4), 1212–1215. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336507. 
>
>

-- 
Join us on Slack: https://join.slack.com/t/votca/signup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/votca/4901d8ce-cf4a-4964-9a63-1d93b9059901n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to