Here are some bizarre low lights on this issue of who is supplying the so  
called Iraqi insurgents and our next war enemy Iran:
    *   "Roadside bombings of American troops in _Iraq_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iraq/index.html?inline=nyt
-geo)   were occurring with unnerving regularity when military investigators 
made a  disturbing discovery: American-made computer circuits sold to a 
trading  company in the _United  Arab Emirates_ (http:/
/topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/unitedarabemirates/index.html?inline=nyt-
geo)  had turned up in the bomb detonators." 
    *   " the Bush administration cited the diversion of the computer  
circuits to _Iran_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iran/index.html?inline=nyt-geo)
 ,  and eventually Iraq, as proof that 
the United Arab Emirates were failing to  prevent American technology from 
slipping into the wrong hands. Administration  officials said aircraft parts, 
specialized metals and gas detectors that have  a potential military use had 
also moved through Dubai, one of the emirates, to  Iran, _Syria_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/syria/index.html?inli
ne=nyt-geo)   or Pakistan." 
    *   "Relations with the United Arab Emirates have long been delicate for 
the  United States. Dubai, for example, is  the host for more Navy ships than 
any port outside the United States  and is an important listening post for 
American intelligence personnel.  .."
Given just these few points, can anyone answer these three questions
    1.  are we sure that the CIA or some other rogue element is not fostering 
the  mess in Iraq ? 
    2.  why isn't the CIA and GAO and DOD stopping this NOW ? 
    3.  and why exactly is our Vice President Dick Cheney building a Dacha in 
 Dubai and Halliburton HQ now located there - a nation without an extradition 
 treaty with the USA ?  just a thought ....
 
Peace, Hugs, and Purrs, 
Carolyn Rose  Goyda
Missouri, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


_U.S.  Alarmed as Some Exports Veer Off Course - New York Times_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/washington/02UAE.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)  
 
 
WASHINGTON — Roadside bombings of American troops in _Iraq_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iraq/index.html?inline
=nyt-geo)   were occurring with unnerving regularity when military 
investigators made a  disturbing discovery: American-made computer circuits 
sold to a 
trading company  in the _United  Arab Emirates_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/unitedarabemirates/index.html?inline=
nyt-geo)  had turned up in the bomb detonators. 
That finding set off a clash with Washington last year when the Bush  
administration cited the diversion of the computer circuits to _Iran_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iran/index.html?inli
ne=nyt-geo) ,  and eventually Iraq, as proof that the United Arab Emirates 
were failing to  prevent American technology from slipping into the wrong 
hands. 
Administration  officials said aircraft parts, specialized metals and gas 
detectors that have a  potential military use had also moved through Dubai, one 
of the emirates, to  Iran, _Syria_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/syria/index.html?inline=nyt-geo)
   or Pakistan. 
The diplomatic face-off, which drew little public attention, prompted the  
United States to threaten tough new controls on exports to the United Arab  
Emirates, an ally. The nation had invested billions to become a global trading  
hub and had begun a campaign to burnish its image in the United States after 
the 
 uproar in 2006 over a proposal to allow a Dubai company manage some American 
 port terminals.  
The administration backed down only after the emirates promised to pass their 
 own export control law. But it is unclear that much has changed nearly a 
year  after the confrontation. 
Yousef al-Otaiba, an adviser to the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates, 
 said his country was more closely monitoring goods that it re-exported while 
 blocking items that might help Iran build weapons systems. But trade experts 
and  Iranian traders in Dubai said there was little evidence that the new 
export  control law was being broadly enforced. 
“It has virtually had no effect, to be honest,” said Nasser Hashempour,  
deputy president of the Iranian Business Council in Dubai. “If someone wants to 
 
move something — get it to Iran — it is easy to be done.” 
Relations with the United Arab Emirates have long been delicate for the  
United States. Dubai, for example, is the host for more Navy ships than any 
port  
outside the United States and is an important listening post for American  
intelligence personnel. Emirates officials have complied with a Bush  
administration request to inspect American-bound ship containers for nuclear  
threats as 
they move through Dubai. 
But the country, which is made up of the emirates Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah,  
Ajman, Al Fujayrah, Umm al Qaywayn and Ras al Khaymah, has deep economic and  
cultural ties with Iran, which is only about 70 miles across the Persian Gulf 
 from Dubai. As many as 400,000 Iranians live in the emirates, many of them  
traders who track down goods in the sprawling consumer bazaar of Dubai and 
then  re-export them to Iran, at times ignoring _United  Nations_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations/index.html
?inline=nyt-org)  trade sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear program and a 
broader  United States embargo.  
Emirates Blame U.S. 
Nearly $12 billion worth of American goods flowed into the emirates in 2007.  
Officials in the emirates say the United States — which prohibits American  
companies from directly selling most goods to Iran and bars foreign companies  
from reselling dual-use products there — has complicated efforts to follow the 
 rules.  
The officials, with trade experts, blame America for overstating the  
potential dangers of certain goods or passing on tips about illicit shipments  
that 
are inaccurate or too vague to act.  
“They like to exaggerate, or at least try to point to some strategic  
significance of the item, like saying, ‘This software program could be used to  
design nuclear power plants,’ even if someone is just buying it to draw puppies 
 
and flowers,” said Clif Burns, an export control lawyer at Powell Goldstein in  
Washington. 
American officials have been increasingly alarmed about trade in the United  
Arab Emirates since 2002, when the Commerce Department sent an inspector, Mary 
 O’Brien, there. From her spot checks of factories, freight forwarders and 
other  companies that had ordered American products subject to export controls, 
 
Commerce officials say, it was clear that dual-use goods, including computer  
equipment, were being diverted on a grander scale than imagined. 
An entity said to be a woodworking shop, for example, had ordered a  
sophisticated American machine for making metal parts. The device, Ms. O’Brien  
knew, 
could also shape components for a missile system. The supposed factory  
contained almost no sawdust, and the few employees could not explain how they  
intended to use the machine. 
“This is not right,” Ms. O’Brien said she had said to herself, convinced 
that  she had turned up her first “briefcase business”— open for inspection, 
but 
 closed for good as soon as she walked out. 
She pressed a Dubai pistachio wholesaler on why he had bought an American  
infrared camera, which can detect living objects in the dark, and where it had  
gone. Later she found he had arranged its return from Iran, where it had  
apparently been diverted, while stalling a follow-up inspection. 
In nearly 40 percent of her inspections in four years, she found that  
regulated items were missing or that the recipient would not cooperate. Many of 
 
those companies were placed on a list, warning American exporters to be careful 
 
when selling to them. 
“This was a huge sieve,” said Lisa A. Prager, a former top Commerce export  
control official. “Almost nothing that said it was going to U.A.E. was staying 
 in U.A.E.” 
 
    *   1  
    *   _2_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/washington/02UAE.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1)   
_Next  Page »_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/washington/02UAE.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1) 
 
Nada El Sawy contributed reporting from Dubai, United Arab  Emirates

 
 















**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.    
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to