What Has He Done For You Lately?



We all know that Lamar Alexander is a fixture in Washington DC politics, but 
what has he done for you lately?  In a recent interview with the Cookeville 
Herald Citizen, Senator Lamar Alexander said that we are not in a recession in 
Tennessee.  He said that recession is "a technical word" and that technically 
we are not in a recession.  Speaking to the graduating class of Tennessee Tech 
Alexander said that there are some big challenges ahead but that we are 
currently only in an "economic slowdown."  Alexander said that something needs 
to be done but I am wondering what the good Senator from Tennessee intends to 
do.  If you examine his voting record, it is clear that the policy decisions 
that Alexander has favored are part of the reason we are in this recession in 
the first place.

 

For starters, let's look at the Senator's record on the war in Iraq.  The war, 
which has cost us some $700 billion dollars and has cost the state of Tennessee 
directly some ten billion dollars in taxpayer expenditures for the war effort, 
means that there are less dollars available in the federal budget for education 
and alternative energy development and it means that there is more federal 
debt.  Alexander voted for the original war and since then he has voted for 
every expenditure that has come before the Senate to extend funding for the 
war.  He has voted against pulling troops out of Iraq when the opportunity has 
arisen.  

 

Lamar has voted for the most destabilizing foreign policy expenditure in recent 
memory.  Experts agree that the biggest reason for high oil prices in the 
global market is because of instability and uncertainty in the Middle East.  
Investor confidence has been greatly shaken by US activities in the Middle East 
and has driven down the value of the dollar in relation to other major 
international currencies.  As a candidate for federal office, I support an 
immediate withdrawal of US armed forces from Iraq.  I have spoken out clearly 
and directly on the issue of the war and my opposition to the current 
misadventure.  If we had not invaded Iraq, the international marketplace would 
have greater confidence in the American economy and the global markets would 
not be reacting with so much fear and uncertainty to current market conditions. 
 

 

Now let's look at taxes.  Senator Alexander supports a flat income tax.  He 
supports reducing the tax rates that wealthy people pay to 15% while at the 
same time he supports expensive, taxpayer funded military ventures.  A flat 
income tax means that rich people will pay less and poor people will pay more.  
Flat taxes are already inherently unequal in terms of revenue and the response 
of a flat tax by state and local municipalities will be to simply increase 
sales taxes and other income generating revenues which will disproportionately 
affect the poor.  Lamar also voted to cut taxes on capital gains and dividends. 
 Lamar has made it clear where his interests lay, and it isn't with the working 
people of this country.  

 

The record of Senator Alexander's votes means we have a higher federal deficit 
because Lamar doesn't believe that rich people should pay their fair share.  It 
also means less opportunity for working class people to get ahead which only 
drives them further into poverty.  As a candidate for federal office, I believe 
that we need to roll back the Bush tax cuts.  Corporations and the wealthy need 
to pay their fair share.  They are members of this country, the same as 
everyone else.  It is time to restore progressive taxation as a national 
policy. 

 

Now let's look at Alexander's record with regard to working people.  I've 
already talked about how a flat tax will end up costing working people more 
money in the long run.  Less federal revenue means more toll roads, 
privatization of public services and higher local, municipal and state taxes to 
pick up the extra needed revenue.  These aspects alone will reduce the standard 
of living for the middle class, but if we continue to support the policies of 
Alexander, we will find that standard of living even further eroded. 

 

Alexander has supported fundamental dismantling of one of the most important 
social safety nets our country has created, the Social Security System.  Now 
why Alexander would be against a federal program that provides support and 
resources to our senior citizens is beyond me, but if it is any indication of 
where he stands, Lamar was given a big fat zero by the Alliance for Retired 
Americans for his anti-senior voting record.  Social Security works, and in 
spite of the Republican scare tactics, the program isn't going broke.  If we 
were to privatize social security, then there is a guarantee that the poorest 
Americans will have nothing when they retire and the whole purpose of the 
program will have been rendered meaningless.  As a candidate for federal office 
I fully support the Social Security program and commend it as one of the most 
successful government programs of the twentieth century for ensuring quality of 
life into old age.

 

There are so many other ways that we could look at Alexander's record which 
show that he votes against the interests of working people and for the 
interests of the wealthy and corporations.  Since Tennessee is mostly made up 
of working people, I wonder who Alexander's decisions are going to work for.  
It is time for progressive leadership in Tennessee.  Time to restore the 
minimum wage to a living wage with annual increases to adjust for cost of 
living.  It is time to support universal single payer health care to ensure 
that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care and it is 
time to use the federal government as an agency for lifting up working people 
rather than letting the market drag them down.  

 

We can make it out of this recession and make this country into a nation that 
works for everyone, but we have to follow sound federal policies in order to 
make this a reality.  It is time to restore progressive taxation as a national 
policy and ask the wealthy and corporations to pay their fair share.  It is 
time to strike down anti-union legislation that increases profits for investors 
by reducing labor costs, shipping jobs overseas and turning our manufacturing 
base into a Walmart service economy.  It is time to make sure that education is 
funded as a priority and defense is secondary in terms of budget allocation to 
the health and well-being of children and families.  As a candidate for the US 
Senate in Tennessee I believe that these are the policies that will insure a 
modest national prosperity for all.  



Chris Lugo for US Senate
9 Music Sq So #164

 Nashville, TN 37203
615-593-0304
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.voteforpeace.info



Donate Online: Paypal or Click and Pledge



Video: Campaign Video 

              MTV News 

              Bush Protest




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to