On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 06:21:40PM -0700, Adam Getchell wrote: > > I don't see how this is true. Openbsd has the same security problems > > in sendmail, named, openssh, ftpd that the rest of the distributions > > have. Either they don't do line by line security audits of PORTS > > As I mentioned in my last message, sendmail and OpenSSH are audited parts of > OpenBSD. Also, I think that ipf is better than ipchains for firewalling. Hm... hasn't really helped them much, has it? :) Micah
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Mark K. Kim
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Bill Broadley
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Bill Broadley
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Adam Getchell
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Micah Cowan
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Bill Broadley
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Peter Jay Salzman
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Sec... Mark K. Kim
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Mark K. Kim
- Re: [vox-tech] Re: OpenBSD and Security Deja User
