[vox-tech] Re: PATH_MAX

[Henry House]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 07:29:29PM -0700, Mark K. Kim wrote:
> That's pretty clever...

Or would be if it was intentional ;-).

[...]
> but on Linux, the path can actually be much longer (it may be
> variable-length?)  I'm not sure if 255 includes NUL or not.

That's next to useless, then. I guess I'll have to allocate memory for the
path dynamically...*sigh*.

-- 
Henry House
OpenPGP key available from http://hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc

PGP signature