matt, you're now asking questions that are out of my realm of expertise. i'm just some sorry putz who happened to stumble across mutt one day and read the first 1000 lines of a 5000 line manual.
it sounds like ted, you, henry, bill and i are the mutt experts around here. if we don't know the answer to your question, may i suggest you go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? they're pretty friendly over there. :) they helped me out with my semi-difficult spamcop send-hook. pete begin Matt Roper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I tried it without the ~t first, but it didn't work that way either. > The ~t is supposed to be a pattern > (see http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#patterns) that tells > it that it is supposed to match on the "To" field of the message. > > At what point does the send-hook get checked? When I write an email, I > don't have mutt prompt me for a To: address; instead I have it pass the > message headers to vim ($edit_headers config var) so that I can edit > them by hand. If send-hooks are only processed before editting, that > might explain my problem. However I doubt this is the case because > aliases get expanded properly after editting the mail and because I also > have a similar problem with my save-hook lines: > > save-hook . +Saved > save-hook "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" +OtherFolder > > As with send-hook, only the default hook gets used; in this case, all > messages go to the "Saved" folder regardless of whether they are from > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" save-hook doesn't have anything to do with message > editting or when headers get set (they're already set by the time I try > to save), so I think I must be understanding something about hooks > improperly. -- ** Please don't send me html email ** PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
