On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Micah Cowan wrote: > That reverse conversion shouldn't be necessary. But I don't count > linebreak transliterations as content modifications, especially since > they're probably allowed.
Jeff pointed out that having bi-diretcional support might be a good idea in case I should ever want to edit them on a server or re-export them with another service. I figured it would be work my time too. :-) > > In addition to parsing being set to use only explicitly included extention > > names, it also only works on clients by their offered name - so if the > > clients ever get "fixed", the routine for this can be removed/changed and > > left to the client to deal with appropriately. > > You shouldn't use extensions at all - you should be basing it on the > MIME type, no? (for receiving, that is - not sending, where the MIME > type will be based on the extension anyway). I did not want to have it adjust all text/* files because some (uu, hqx, etc) may be better off not modified. This allows me to specify which text/? to map over to alter. I may change to text/* over the long term, but for now, extention specific seems to work rather well 8-D -ME -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/CM$/IT$/LS$/S/O$ !d--(++) !s !a+++(-----) C++$(++++) U++++$(+$) P+$>+++ L+++$(++) E W+++$(+) N+ o K w+$>++>+++ O-@ M+$ V-$>- !PS !PE Y+ !PGP t@-(++) 5+@ X@ R- tv- b++ DI+++ D+ G--@ e+>++>++++ h(++)>+ r*>? z? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ decode: http://www.ebb.org/ungeek/ about: http://www.geekcode.com/geek.html _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
