doug, don't apologize. even if it's not the answer (which i'm betting it is), it's an EXCELLENT answer. kudos to you; i should've thought of that!
pete begin Doug Huckaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > OK, I avoided answering this post becasue I don't have all the details, > but... I remember trying to use SWAT under Redhat (5.2 or 6.1 I think) and > there was a commnented out field in the inetd.conf that had to do with > SWAT. Basically (according to my poor excuse for a memory) SWAT ran it's > own web "server". The inetd entry (which was commented out by default for > security reasons) called a specific command that returned the SWAT > interface to the client browser. It had nothing to do with gnome or > apache. > > I'm sorry that's not a very detailed answer and with my current workload I > can't research further right now. If I can find some time next week, I'll > reply with more details. > > Back then, I found that Swat would hose up my smb.conf pretty bad, so I > stopped using it (after I lost a few hours of configuration). I suggest > being very careful and making backup's of the smb.conf before using. > > -doug _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
