Hi All, For the past few months I've been using convert, inside a perl script, to resize all jpg images in a dir, using this syntax: `convert -geometry $geo $from $to`;
According to the man page, this uses a default quality of 75, on a scale of 0(worst)..100(best). Generally I have been satisfied with that quality, but sometimes not. So, I would like the option of a higher image quality, while still staying within the image size constraints of the web page design. When I use this syntax: `convert -geometry $geo -quality $qual $from $to`; for various values of $qual ( 75 or 85 or 95) there is no obvious difference in the 'visual' quality of the images. Also, each comparable file has the same size. And running diff on any two files yields no difference. So, the files do not seem to be effected by the '-quality' option. Are the quality and geometry options mutually exclusive? What am I missing? Thanks, Jim __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
