ok already! this is getting a little out of hand. if you would have read my previous post you would have known that this is not the client that came with my NON M$ system.
you come up with a good email client that can deal with multi-byte character sets, that is free, and is not a giant bloaty monster (i.e. mozilla), and that will run on OS 9. i'll say it again - i hate outlook express - but i am using it out of necessity- not because i want to. in just in case you didn't realize it- there are some people (i.e. people who have never been lucky enough to have a threaded client) who did not know that replying to an unrelated message would cause such havoc. i simple request not to do it would have been enough. -dylan on 03.10.9 8:44 AM, Jonathan Stickel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] was reported to have writen: > > This is too tempting an opportunity to bash outlook users... > > As Rich points out, it is always easier to hit "reply" than "compose", > where you have to _manually_ type in a "to" address and a subject line. > This is true of most email clients. > > But there _is_ a social correlation to outlook: those who are too lazy > to click compose are also the ones who are too lazy to explore > alternative email clients to the default, but extremely faulty, email > client bundled on their M$ system... ;) > > Jonathan > > _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
