On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Mark K. Kim wrote: > DivX's compression is definitely better than MPEG2. And somehow MPEG4 and > DivX is related but I'm not exactly sure how. They seem to either share > compression techniques or have the ability to embed one format in the > other, or it's just a different name for the same thing -- I'm not sure. > Anyway, MPEG4 and DivX are very comparable and a video made in one format > seems to be playable in a player that understands the other format. > > -Mark
I think 'DivX ;-)' was originally reverse-engineered from MS's MPEG4 codec. Or the internals of the codec was hacked out. That's why they used to be compatible, but the latest version of 'DivX ;-)' 5 (?) has enough modifications to not be MPEG4 compatible. FL _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
