-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 17 October 2003 02:45 pm, Jonathan Stickel wrote: > I hesitate to post my 2-cents due to ignorance, but here goes: > > It seems to me that the point of choosing not to archive a message (with > X-No-Archive) is because the message is not worth archiving for some > reason (e.g. one-liner, too silly, etc.). > > Anyone thinking that they can protect personal information by not > archiving a message should think again. Any message sent to a vox list > is sent to over 100 different person's mailboxes who can do with it what > they will...
My concern is that someone could post a question that deals with something illegal (DMCA violations). Archiving this would be bad. - -- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: 3B30 C6BE B1C6 9526 7A90 34E7 11DF 44F3 7217 7BC7 On pgp.mit.edu, import with `gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 72177BC7` Also available at http://www.cal.net/~ryan/ryan_at_mother_dot_com.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE/kKjPEd9E83IXe8cRArK8AJYu4odaf/bz6Q6RSNwBUe7QfV5aAJ4544O9 gic55H4p0l0GfhPDgJ8qkg== =9Pu6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
