The new configuration is as follows:
64MB ram /dev/hda 1GB /dev/hdc CD-ROM /dev/hdd 2GB
/dev/hdd is the drive installed this morning, because that's where there was physically space for it, and I that's how I could connect the IDE cable after I found the physical space.
I recall hearing somewhere that if a HDD is a slave to something slow (like a CD-ROM drive), then that HDD will will also be really slow.
I'd like to find out whether I'll need to re-arrange these drives to get decent performance, so I have three questions:
a) Is a CD-ROM drive really slow as an IDE device?
b) Will a slow master slow down the slave?
If I have to rearrange the drives as master/slave, then:
c) Do cable positions matter concerning master/slave configuration or just the jumper settings?
In case you all want to comment, my proposed configuration is: * x-window-system * icewm * xftree * galeon * openoffice.org * custom kernel with the supermount patch applied from the package kernel-patch-2.4-supermount-ng, because I don't expect them to understand or care about mount/umount logic on their floppies.
-- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. My key was last signed 10/14/2003. If you use GPG *please* see me about signing the key. ***** My computer can't give you viruses by email. ***
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
