--- Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu 18 Dec 03, 9:27 AM, Jim Angstadt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > --- Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > has anybody thought about these types of > spams > > > in relation to bayesian > > > filters? or perhaps read an article > written by > > > someone who's given the > > > matter some thought? > > <snip> > > > > Paul Graham has numerous articles on spam in > > general and bayesian filters in particular: > > > > http://www.paulgraham.com/antispam.html > > > > In some of his earlier articles he advocated > > regular training, iirc. > > > > Jim > > hi jim, > > that's quite a collection of reading! :) > > too much, in fact. can you point me to which > article you were thinking > of that answers my question? <snip>
Hi Pete, These may be more helpful than the others: http://www.paulgraham.com/ffb.html http://paulgraham.com/better.html The "better" one does discuss spam like you got, while the "ffb" talks about fighting back against spammers. Jim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
