On Tuesday 13 April 2004 03:43 am, Dave Margolis margolid-at-ecs.csus.edu |lugod| wrote: > alright, i'll restate: > it seems apt users have to put a lot of trust in whoever maintains the > package lists on their apt server(s) of choice. is this correct? i > have limited debian use, but i've muddled with apt-rpm on a fedora box > quite a bit and it seems pretty solid. how often does an apt-get > update/upgrade break things? (and i suppose this depends on one's use of > stable or testing).
An update to iproute2 in RH9 broke some things for us at work. Silently removed support for HTB. It still hasn't been fixed.... we use yum on our redhat boxes, which i happen to prefer over apt on rpm based distros. -- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: 3B30 C6BE B1C6 9526 7A90 34E7 11DF 44F3 7217 7BC7 On pgp.mit.edu, import with `gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 72177BC7` Also available at http://www.XXXXXXX/~ryan/ryan_at_mother_dot_com.asc _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
