On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:45:13PM -0700, Rod Roark wrote: > On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:09 pm, Brian Lavender wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:19:03AM -0700, Rod Roark wrote: > ... > > > Well I use Postfix. I believe the rough equivalent with > > > that would be something like amavisd-new which runs > > > SpamAssassin "internally", using the "before queue content > > > filter" which Postfix introduced with release 2.1. I don't > > > know anyone who has tried this combination yet. > > > > Well, does Postfix do the following?!!! This mail was rejected at the > > SMTP layer. This way, the sender doesn't think he sent it. If the mail > > had been accepted, it would have returned a code 500. If I had tried to > > bounce this spam, it would have gone to some unknow domain "gandalf". > > Postfix's built-in spam controls (such as RBL checks) > operate like this. In the past, for 3rd party filters like > SpamAssassin you had to accept the mail first; but if you > use the above-mentioned "before queue" interface, you can > presumably invoke stuff like SpamAssassin and ClamAV while > the SMTP connection is still active. > > Thanks for the detailed info!
Why is it I always think I have the sliced bread, when someone else is selling bread slicers? :) -- Brian Lavender http://www.brie.com/brian/ _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
