Quoting Nick Schmalenberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Huh. Thanks, I didn't know that. Previously I had the impression that > Blackdown was a totally Sun-independent implementation of Java, which > was why it was behind in Java compatibility, but had a more free > license. So then is more Linux compatibility at the cost of less Java > compatibility all there is to Blackdown?
I defer to Pete's scholarly answer on the point -- except to add (and please pardon the slight repetition) that Blackdown seems to do a much better job of fully porting and packaging the software properly for Linux distros. _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
