On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:05, Rod Roark wrote: > On Thursday 15 December 2005 12:56 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > ... > > > It really seems like someone sat down with pen and paper and wrote out > > all the things that suck about cvs, and fixed it with subversion. I > > think _choosing_ to use cvs rather than svn is like choosing to use > > netscape 4 instead of firefox. LOL. > > Agreed. Yet SourceForge STILL offers only CVS.
Yeah, what's up with that? We've been using Subversion at work for quite awhile now. And at home, I use Subversion to keep track of my writing and personal projects. I used to use CVS, but then I realized I needed a new directory structure; and we all know how well CVS deals with changes in directory structures. Using Subversion has solved all of the headaches I ever had in maintaining my personal files. -- Richard S. Crawford http://www.mossroot.com AIM: Buffalo2K Yahoo: rscrawford "Whatever does not kill me makes me stranger." --Llewellyn
pgpbAQUj3qJp5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
