> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:37:14PM -0700, Seth Nagao wrote: > > My roommate had a similar situation, and we found that Fedora and > > Ubuntu are paintfully slow. The solution we came up with was Vector > > Linux, which is targeted towards older hardware. > > What was it about Fedora and Ubuntu that was 'slow,' compared to Vector? > e.g., what were they doing different? Or could you tell? >
Were you running these as LiveCD's or installed on the system? For my particular situation I'm planning on installing to the harddrive... I just wish my home internet connection was faster so I could get the blasted iso's downloaded... Kyle Oliveira _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
