On Fri 01 Sep 06, 3:02 AM, Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Quoting Peter Jay Salzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > You'd be shocked at the effectiveness of rejecting email that says it comes > > from "dirac.org" or email that doesn't have a valid fqdn sender. > [...] > > All this stuff is done at the MTA level, so no delivery is attempted. > > Ditto that. > > For those using the Exim4 MTA, consider the EximConfig prepackaged > configuration set as a starting point: > http://www.jcdigita.com/eximconfig/ It includes Exim4 ACLs that > actively check for various forms of RFC compliance prior to SMTP-level > acceptance. > > Kudos on joining the "reject, don't bounce" movement. ;-> Yeah, I've always been there. :) Never understood why anyone in their right mind would add yet _more_ spam related traffic to the net when we already have so much. It seems ... crazy to me.
Pete -- The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits of a digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does at the top of a mountain or in the petals of a flower. To think otherwise is to demean the Buddha, which is to demean oneself. -- Robert M. Pirsig Peter Jay Salzman, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.dirac.org/p PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
