On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Bill Broadley (b...@cse.ucdavis.edu): > > > Er, right in the bold 3rd paragraph he mentions /boot, he mentioned in in > > the > > why partition paragraph... twice. In fact he mentioned /boot as 4th most > > important partition ahead of /tmp, /var, /home, and /usr/local. He > > mentioned > > /boot a dozen or so times, and it's in his examples that he lists. > > > > So what is factually incorrect again? > > It's not in his basic recommendation, nor his "How many partitions" > list, nor his desktop recommendation. The only example he has it in is > "A suggested laptop/desktop configuration" at the end. You're > characterisation of "strong on /boot" is obviously wrong -- as will be > apparent to anyone who actually reads the page. > > But, you know, Karsten has already done his best to set you straight.
This is sounding personal. I am sure that Bill's system will run, whichever method he choose. Why such factually logical steadfastness? Once again, "LVM is king!" Horaay for the king. Long live the king, LVM. brian -- Brian Lavender http://www.brie.com/brian/ _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
