> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [vox-tech] Memory addressing?
> From: "Chanoch (Ken) Bloom" <kbl...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, June 22, 2010 9:46 am
> To: lugod's technical discussion forum <vox-tech@lists.lugod.org>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:11:44AM -0700, Brian Lavender wrote:
> > Can someone confirm what is correct?
> >
> > Tim and I were discussing memory addressing at Crepeville last night
> > and we had a disagreement about how memory is addressable. I say that
> > on today's common intel i386 32 bit architecture (in case you are one of
> > those souls who builds your hardware from scratch), that memory is byte
> > (octet) addressable. You can load a byte from memory into the lower 8
> > bits of a register. Tim says that memory is only addressable on 32 bit
> > word boundaries.
> >
I stand corrected. Now that I have my hardware textbook open,
Tanenbaum 1990, I see that the smallest addressable unit on most
computers
is the byte -- 8 bits. Bytes are grouped into words. The word-length is
the size of the registers, not registers and memory.
<snip>
> Consider the following program. The fact that you can get pointers to
> arbitrary characers should be enough proof that the architecture is
> byte addressable.
Tanenbaum calls the smallest addressable unit a cell. He then lists
examples
of cell lengths for 11 computers. Before cells were standardized
to 8 bits, they ranged from 1 bit to 60 bits per cell. Therefore, a 60
bits per cell computer would store a single ASCII character in the
lowest
7 bits and set the upper 53 bits to off (probably). You could then
allocate
a pointer to address that 60 bit cell.
The reason for the discussion was Brian's intrusion detection
implementation stored the incoming packets in a hash
table. The key to the hash table was quite
large -- inbound IP address, outbound IP address, inbound port, and
outbound port. I thought to my self, on a very large implementation (say
Google) the table could grow to a billion entries. Could a hash table
store this amount in memory? Could you allocate an array of half the
total memory? Could you allocate an array of a billion integers? Brian,
on his laptop, couldn't allocate a billion integers. But he could
allocate a billion characters (bytes). Since I thought both bytes and
integers were words, and since I thought memory stored words
like registers stored words, we had our discussion.
The following failed to compile with an array-to-large error:
int main( void )
{
int table[ 1000000000 ];
return 0;
}
The following succeeded to compile:
int main( void )
{
char table[ 1000000000 ];
return 0;
}
This compiles but core dumps:
#include <stdio.h>
int main( void )
{
char table[ 1000000000 ];
printf( "Hello world!\n" );
}
<snip>
_______________________________________________
vox-tech mailing list
vox-tech@lists.lugod.org
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
