my bad. i haven't looked at the 2.2 kernels in a long time. i was taking
jay's word that the last one was 2.2.23. but that still doesn't change
anything discussed here.
there are a few problems with the kernel which are currently being ironed
out. right now, kernel versioning for device drivers is a big ugly mess,
and is in the process of being reworked.
i'm unaware of problems with the memory manager, but i haven't been reading
kernel cousin lately.
what is the issue with the MM?
pete
begin: Terminator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quote
> Hi, I guess there's something confusing here. From kernel.org, you can
> figure out that the latest stable kernel of 2.2 serial is just 2.2.19,
> there's not 2.2.23 at all!
>
> And althouth kernel 2.4 serial is "stable", it've suffered from MM
> problems in heavy load for a long time. Maybe this will not be resolved
> untill 2.4.9... ;-p
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> > begin: Jay Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quote
> > > Ok, I understand. 2.2.23 is stable. But why aren't they using the new
> > > 2.4.5 kernel? Or are they (debian), but their release number doesn't have
> > > anything to do with the kernel version?
> ____________________________________________________________
> Jingmin (Jimmy) Zhou
> E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ : 19587415
>
> The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make
> for ourselves. - Terminator II, Judgement Day
> ____________________________________________________________
>
--
"The following addresses had permanent fatal errors..." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mailer Daemon www.dirac.org/p
