On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Micah Cowan wrote:
> No. In fact, the FSF is very strongly against licenses that require
> you to release the source simply because of personal modifications. I
> believe the Apple Public Source License is an example. If you read
> the reasons the FSF terms this a "non-free" license, one of the
> biggest reasons it remains so despite changes to appease the FSF is
> that "any modified version 'deployed' in an organization must be
> published." cf. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html
Okay, so you said a lot of other things below (which I very much
appreciate), but since I'm using this code only for our company in-house
stuff we don't need to release it, right?
Thanks, Micah!
-Mark
--
Mark K. Kim
http://www.cbreak.org/mark/
PGP key available upon request.
