Well there be a tarball like the ISO, soon? Regards, Pascal de Bruijn
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:57 +0800, Kim-man 'Punky' TSE wrote: > No, not the same. But you may check, the kernel may support it. > > Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > Does this: > > > > http://www.voyage.hk/download/voyage/voyage-current.tar.gz > > > > Also use unionfs? > > > > Regards, > > Pascal de Bruijn > > > > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:35 +0800, Kim-man 'Punky' TSE wrote: > > > >> Hi Pascal, > >> > >> Down the voyage-current.iso and give it a try: > >> http://www.voyage.hk/download/ISO/voyage-current.iso > >> > >> This is a demostration of live CD concept which will probably be > >> deployed in 0.3. The live CD is squashfs + unionfs. The final 0.3 > >> distro would be similar. > >> > >> I do not finalize the way it goes. The current kernel in my development > >> already support squashfs and unionfs, and I need more feedback and input > >> on this. > >> > >> - Punky > >> > >> Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I noticed the ro/rw problems has been solved by symlinks. > >>> > >>> Has anybody considered using tmpfs and unionfs? For example: > >>> > >>> /dev/hda1 -> / (ro) > >>> tmpfs -> /rw (rw) > >>> unionfs -> /rw,/ > >>> > >>> This would mean the whole filesystem would be writable, yet /dev/hda1 > >>> would be read only. All changes to / would be written to /rw, instead > >>> of /dev/hda1. > >>> > >>> Using a script /rw could be synced to, say for example /dev/hda2, a > >>> seperate partition. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Pascal de Bruijn > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- http://blog.pcode.nl/ http://del.icio.us/pmjdebruijn/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/pmjdebruijn/ _______________________________________________ Voyage-linux mailing list [email protected] http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux
