I'm running Voyage 0.2 on a WRAP with one CM9 as the 5GHz backhaul and an Engenius 2611 as the wlan0 AP for customers. The nine clients are mostly Engenius CB3s (one SmartBridge outdoor) at 1.5-3.0 miles using a variety of antennas (typically PacWireless 16db Yagis or 15/19db grid) as required by the client site. All of them have excellent signal strengths (as reported by the CB3 web interface and also as compared to other AP/clients elsewhere in my system).

In general, the CB3s will associate and work well at reported "Quality" values of anything in the high 40s% and up but on this particular AP, they take an inordinately long time to associate (if at all) at quality values below about 70% and sometimes may take hours before finally linking. Once associated, the link works well with data rates pushing 4 mbs download. I'm using a PacWireless 13db horizontal omni connected to the AP radio with about 6' of LMR400. The cable has been replaced once with no noticeable improvement.

hh1:/usr/local/bin# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0     Scan completed :
         Cell 01 - Address: 00:02:6F:41:FC:8C
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=34/70  Signal level=-66 dBm  Noise level=-90 dBm
         Cell 02 - Address: 00:02:6F:41:FB:88
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=34/70  Signal level=-65 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm
         Cell 03 - Address: 00:02:6F:41:FB:89
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=37/70  Signal level=-64 dBm  Noise level=-90 dBm
         Cell 04 - Address: 00:30:1A:02:12:BC
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=33/70  Signal level=-66 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm
         Cell 05 - Address: 00:02:6F:37:BA:9F
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=34/70  Signal level=-65 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm
         Cell 06 - Address: 00:02:6F:45:82:88
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=35/70  Signal level=-64 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm
         Cell 07 - Address: 00:02:6F:41:FC:A6
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=37/70  Signal level=-64 dBm  Noise level=-90 dBm
         Cell 08 - Address: 00:02:6F:43:0A:84
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=37/70  Signal level=-63 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm
         Cell 09 - Address: 00:02:6F:41:FE:1D
                   Mode:Managed
                   Quality=40/70  Signal level=-61 dBm  Noise level=-89 dBm

wlan0     IEEE 802.11b  ESSID:"nrvu-hh1"
         Mode:Master  Frequency:2.447 GHz  Access Point: 00:02:6F:42:BC:AA
         Bit Rate:11 Mb/s   Tx-Power=23 dBm   Sensitivity=1/3
         Retry min limit:8   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
         Encryption key:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   Security mode:restricted
         Power Management:off
         Link Quality:0  Signal level:0  Noise level:0
         Rx invalid nwid:0  Rx invalid crypt:396511  Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:860573 Invalid misc:58515241 Missed beacon:0

I've got potential customers in locations that should connect easily but site survey tests have been disappointing. Any suggestions on what may be happening here are greatly appreciated.

Note that this site is almost identical to many others where signal strengths are sometimes significantly lower (many in the mid to upper -70db range as reported at the AP by iwlist wlanX scan) than those above and yet the clients associate at those sites immediately and work well.

Thanks,

Edwin



--
<=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=>
Edwin Whitelaw, P.E.
New River Valley Unwired, LLC
2200 Lonesome Dove Dr
Christiansburg, VA 24073
540-239-0318


_______________________________________________
Voyage-linux mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.voyage.hk/mailman/listinfo/voyage-linux

Reply via email to